We deliver your Brunstrom petition to the IPCC

I'm a bit confused as to how this man is still in his position. I don't understand his logic. If someone is killed at work due to an accident we don't ban work, if someone is killed in a car accident we don't ban cars, if someone is killed in a plane crash we don't ban planes, if someone dies rock climbing we don't ban rock climbing, etc., etc. So if someone dies in a bike accident why does he want to ban bikes? All he seems to do is undermine the good work the rest of the country's Police forces are trying to do by raising rider awareness and training, etc. I don't see what service he is providing the general public. However he does seem to be providing for his own agenda by becoming the key focus point for thousands of like minded people. He is becoming famous, laughably I agree, but famous nonetheless. I would also wager that when or if he is removed from his position then he will probably sell his story to the papers to make even more money. Ps. I would like to extend my sincere condolences to the family of the poor gentleman who's death has now been publicly debated for all the wrong reasons. Keith

I can't help but compare Brunstroms tacticts to terrorists shock tactics. I know he didn't kill anyone but to parade those pictures was sick, just like al-qaida did with those hostages they beheaded. To do it without the consent of the bereaved is disgracefull, as is his conduct towards motorcyclists in general. For Mark Gibney's family to learn the true extent of his injuries through the media is terrible. Although I have not, and do not want to see these pictures, the graphic description provided by the police was enough to make me feel physically sick. Brunstrom should start to clear his desk and get ready for the big heave-ho. I know Mr. Gibney was riding illegally and erratically, but the exact cause for the accident hasn't been brought up as far as I know. Does anybody know the cause?