Skip to content

Kawasaki KLR250 Trail Motorbike Review

Find By Make/Model

1 of 11
Kawasaki KLR250 motorcycle review - Side view
Click to enlarge
Previous image Next image

Kawasaki KLR250 (1984-2001)

Detail Value
Engine size 249 cc
Power 26 bhp
Top speed 86 mph
Insurance group 7 of 17
  MCN ratings Owners' ratings
Overall rating is 3 rating is 3
Engine rating is 3 rating is 2.5
Ride & Handling rating is 3 rating is 3.5
Equipment rating is 2 rating is 3
Quality & Reliability rating is 4 rating is 3
Value rating is 3 rating is 3.5

MCN overall verdict rating is 3

Look up ‘easy going’ in any encyclopedia and you’ll see a cheesy picture of Kawasaki’s KLR250 beaming back at you. Kawasaki's KLR250 is a fun, economical, long-lasting and undemanding dual purpose machine. Most will undoubtedly have led hard lives as introductory green laners or farm bikes, but a little TLC and an easy throttle hand will keep a Kawasaki KLR250  oing for at least as long as people can read.


MCN rating rating is 3
Owners' rating rating is 2.5

The Kawasaki KLR250's liquid-cooled 4v SOHC motor is easy to kick over hot or cold. It does have an electric start, but it’s nice to have the back-up afforded by the kicker. Once fired up its quite smooth and the power’s just a smooth run up to the red line. It’s not as spunky as Honda’s CRM250 stroker, which claims another 10bhp, but it’s reliable enough for 50,000 miles without any major dramas. Avoid pillions.

Ride and Handling

MCN rating rating is 3
Owners' rating rating is 3.5

Since the last Kawasaki KLR250 came into the UK in 2001 it’s hard to make universal claims for handling – as many will be very tired. But with new fork springs and oil, a refreshed shock and greased linkages the Kawasaki KLR250 handles light trails just fine. The Kawasaki KLR250 was never intended as an enduro machine and its limitations are obvious off (and on) road. The brakes weren’t brilliant to start with, by now they’ll need a complete overhaul.


MCN rating rating is 2
Owners' rating rating is 3
On top of the kicker and e-start Kawasaki threw in a tacho for the KLR250, so you can watch the revs spin like billy-o. There are a few aftermarket exhausts made – Staintune and Big Gun to name two.

Quality and Reliability

MCN rating rating is 4
Owners' rating rating is 3

By-and-large the Kawasaki KLR250 is well made and intrinsically robust. Avoid anything that puffs blue smoke on start-up, anything that rattles and anyone who can’t tell you how to find the screw-adjusted valves (easy-peasy).


MCN rating rating is 3
Owners' rating rating is 3.5

Kawasaki KLR250's will have had hard lives. But they are hardy wee beasties and should give plenty of riding pleasure. No Kawasaki KLR250 is worth more than a grand, though, even in the best of nick and even the oldest CRM MK 1 is a much better, more versatile buy. Find a Kawasaki KLR250 for sale.


Insurance group: 7 of 17

Compare motorcycle insurance quotes now

Model History

1984: Kawasaki KLR250 introduced and ran virtually unchanged except for cosmetics for 17 years.
2001: Kawasaki KLR250 discontinued in the UK.

Other Versions



Top speed 86 mph
1/4-mile acceleration 20.4 secs
Max power 26 bhp
Max torque 18 ft-lb
Weight 117 kg
Seat height 855 mm
Fuel capacity 11 litres
Average fuel consumption 65 mpg
Tank range 150 miles
Annual road tax
Insurance group 7 of 17
Engine size 249 cc
Engine specification 4v single, 6 gears
Frame Tubular steel cradle
Front suspension adjustment None
Rear suspension adjustment Preload
Front brakes 212mm disc
Rear brake Drum
Front tyre size 3.00 x 21
Rear tyre size 4.60 x 17

Owners' Overall Rating rating is 3(2 reviews)

  • Does not rev, needs more gears for top end


    Average rating rating is 3

    Show Details

    Ride and Handling
    Quality and Reliabilty

    I have only ridden my KLR 250.I do not know how representative of KLR 250's my one is. But my bike background is KMX 125 & KMX200, KLR 650, BMW GS 650 Dakar. I downsized from the big bikes for better mpg. Having had the two stroke KMX 200 I know Kawasaki can produce pocket rockets. However I did not want to go 2 stroke again because I was sick of my clothes stinking of 2 stroke oil after 2 hours in the saddle. So the KLR 250 (I thought) was the way to go. The article is not accurate. ( I am writing this 27th July 2012, a previous poster says mistakes in the article have been rectified... they have not). There are mistakes. The KLR 250 does *not* have electric start. The engine (well my one which is old so I do not know how "normal" it is) straining by 8000rpm.It is not happy and balanced before the 8000 indicated. The absolute max rpm achieved on my one between gear shifts is 8,800rpm indicated. At this rpm it really is rough. (early valve bounce?) So why do Kawasaki redline it much higher than this? Maximum rpm (not blipping between gears)seems to be 8000rpm and maybe just up to 8500rpm downhill if you are lucky. As mine is the only KLR250 I have ridden I am not sure how representative this is generally. I think my one is not the best and tired. I like the (totally accurately recorded) 79.4mpg achieved riding all around Cornwall and Devon. Mixture of riding across Dartmoor (on the roads), A roads, and town centres (proper touring). With sections of flat out dual carriageway this was reduced to 62.4mpg. (Figures are imperial UK gallons) Plus points... starts easily (1st, 2nd or 3rd kick). Although I do triathlon training, and after all day training, kicking it then is the only time I have found it laboured. I find comfort reasonable. I have been in the saddle for 10 hours sometimes with stops for fuel and sandwiches. Sure it is not as comfortable as the BMW GS 650 Dakar where I can sit in the saddle all day and feel totally fresh at the end of it. It does feel more comfortable than my KMX's to be in the saddle for long periods. 64.2-79.4 mpg on open touring is the main plus point. Good analogue dials. Bad points:- Too low geared in top gear or needs more gears. It does not rev and on my one is too easy to sit at max rpm in top gear. Even on country lanes I often want another gear or two more than what I have. Does not rev to my satisfaction. Really 6500-7400 on mine feels the optimal sustained limit. Although I have sat at 8000rpm for sustained periods, but that does not feel "sweet". Sometimes indicator switch needs to be triple check its turned off, as sometimes hard to centralise on mine. Brakes could be sharper. ---------------------------------------------- The big brother KLR 650 was not that fast and too heavy. Hence I went for this 250 having owned 650's before. However now I want to check out the Suzuki DR 350 maybe as an "in between" that may have what I want. The lack of top end rpm and the need of additional top gears are the reasons why my rating is 3 stars across the board. If it revved and had more gears it would have ticked all my boxes. Summary good comfortable run about for short trips only. Great mpg. Needs to rev and have more gears though.

    27 July 2012

  • KLR250


    Average rating rating is 3

    Show Details

    Ride and Handling
    Quality and Reliabilty

    Had one of these years ago. Because its a single there's a reasonable amount of power at low revs but there isn't much point in revving it out. Somebikes have had problems with cams pitting due to restricted oil flow to the head. If used at high revs for sustained periods of times it can burn oil and the end can is prone to rusting. It wheelies and stoppies fairly well and the bikes light so it can be thrown about easily. On the road the bikes ok but the lack of power makes overtaking at anything other than lower speeds a long winded effort. Handling is fairly good but the 21" front wheel limits decent road bias tyre choice. Its got adequate power for green laning and this is probably its niche. For those not wanting to bomb around it's a good choice and fuel economy is very imrpessive.

    05 February 2012


Discuss this

Add your comment

User's Badge


Well spotted

Looks there was an error while copying from word to the site. It's corrected now.

19 May 2008 17:39



Can't Believe The Engine Review

I believe the Engine review on this KLR250 to be totaly exagerated in fact I believe that it isn't referring to the same engine at all.... Now Now Lads A Lot More Attention To Detail Is Required. Best Regards...

21 June 2007 17:50

Most popular

Rate my bike