Fetch the nurse
The pair of you are fkin fruitcakes!..Orange fruitcakes.
Love it Wosi, fckin love it
Now, if you'll stop beathing in mind bending crotch odour for a moment from those yellow panties you wear as a face mask.
I know you like to convince yourself that Stoner had a huge bike advantage but using his times as a yardstick for bike performance doesn't work as he swapped bikes. If you took him out of the results and there was another Honda in second place every race that would have taken the win instead, the argument would have more merit. There wasn't, the other two between them would still only have won half the races Stoner did. He won more on the Ducati than the pair of them have in 5 years on the Honda
Using Hayden's Motegi 2010 / 2011 times, as you say, he improved by 1.4 secs. Would Stoner have got more out of it than that, another half second say? Spies knocked 1s off Rossi's 2010 time - would Rossi have found the extra half second Lorenzo did. Most likely. Fair to say then, that Stoner would have found more than Hayden and if so, his Ducati could have been around pole or second.
I don't put too much faith in playing with figures like this - too many variables for any conclusions as to how much one manufacturer improved their bike. You can play with them and produce any conclusion you like - too subjective.
Reasonable to say then that the rider made the difference to Honda in 2011, you're going to have to accept it one day...... but yes, the Honda was a better bike than the Ducati.