Motorcycle Forums

Ah well

Understandable, as you have no basis for sound argument against them

Well BCB

that a badly injured rider on a 250 BHP missile might pose a safety problem to himself and those around him.

You mean pose more of a danger than some yellow flopsy travelling so slowly on a 250bhp missile that he might take one up the rear by something travelling a little faster.....?? 

BCB

Come on Rev, behave, that rent boy delighted in hammering it home, regarding Stoner's condition. You know as well as I do, anyone who suffers a blow to the head, or are unconcious, they don't ride, Stoner had a leg injury What did Lorenzo have back in 250's, injuries to both feet/ankles, and was on crutches, it didn't stop him from riding. they're paid to ride, they're not footballers, Michael Rutter rode with a broken collar bone and other one pinned. The Doctors in MotoGP are more than capable of knowing whether a rider is good to go or not. If you want to stick up for that little 'rent boy' you can do, it's just his hormones, because he's got to change his Casey Stoner Duvet now, and he doesn't know who to put on it next.

Cornball ...

... I'm sorry but I can't agree - Soup's right.

Look at Crutchlow with his double dislocated, broken ankle at Silverstone and then Stoner with his detatched foot at Indy - just an oversize Alpinestar wagging in the wind?

No.

Both were very fortunate to avoid further, and far more serious, injury.

tit

conceited as well as arrogant.Try to understand that your opinions are not always correct.