Constant repetition of a nonsensical argument when you are incapable of rebutting counter arguments makes your argument no less nonsensical, unfortunately for you supermario.
It was obviously no concern of pedrosa's that stoner crashed in 2012, just as with lorenzo and rossi in 2010, and credit to those riders for meeting the first requirement of gp bike racing and staying on the bikes and having their success in those years, particularly lorenzo since he won the championship. Their results for those years will always be in the record books, and the first assumption should be that they may well have triumphed anyway.
However, deciding that the relativity of 2 riders for all time can be judged by the points difference in an individual year severely affected by injury is nonsensical, and a counter argument you continue to refuse to address. By your argument lorenzo is vastly rossi's superior for all time because of the results of the 2010 season; I am aware there were people who argued along those lines at the time, although not many applied the argument to the entire careers of both riders, but they were also incorrect. If you really want to indulge in reductio ad absurdum, I guess kevin schwantz is a great deal better than wayne rainey, and alex criville is better than mick doohan to an even more massive extent.
Stoner rode the indy race with a fractured ankle requiring surgery, returned earlier than some medical advice suggested he should, and rode the races after his return both affected by injury and with the threat of worse and more permanent damage if he had another accident, which could just possibly have affected his results in races other than the three he missed, certainly the indy race and the japanese and malaysian races anyway.
Your grasp of basic arithmetic would also seem flimsy; if stoner wins the three races he missed pedrosa scores at least 10 points less in 2 of the races; of course he may not have had the mishap at aragon as well, and hence have won the championship, which is a further reason why playing hypotheticals about the significance of the points difference in that year alone is nonsensical.