Ducks at the fair..
Hahaha..the three wise monkeys, like pretty maids all in a row.
Sorry for the confusion Simon?
Well..I'll give you credit for holding your hand up and admitting the misleading bias of the double post rant against Rossi but, we both know the confusion was intended to paint the picture Orange..?
..it would be far easier to get on the yam or honda and win a championship than win 1 single race on the ducati and that is what puts stoners time at ducati into perspective..."
Fuck me..a lecture on perspective. Stoner won three races to look flash at the end of 2010, inbetween all the gravel spitting..But he couldn't win the championship on the best bike last year, could he? No sunshine..he couldn't even beat his team mate.
..then we have Pacey - probably the most visibly hurt #27er on the planet since Stoner departed trying to tell everyone who'll listen that it's really Lawson who's his hero - chirping away in the backgound, over sensitive in his delicate state, bless him.
It wasn't wosi who brought stats up and tried to mislead Pal? Get the fk over it..wositherapy suggests a new Lawson avatar, he's far more deserving of praise than the whining Ausralian..who couldn't hack it so he packed it.
..and last but most definitley least, mister Billy bollox himself the boy blunt Bulto..giving out advice on taking liberties..
haha..I'd bet you were born doing that fker Pal?
wosi's maths is a sight better than your english comprehension..but don't let that stop you rushing in and looking a tit. Reading between the lines and thinking for yourself ain't a strong point, is it?
You keep saying we don't know - usually followed by I never said that - but we do know, because of the stopwatch and the maths.
2 seconds this year and ninth. 1.2 seconds last year and fifth at Sepang 1.
The wosacus makes that 0.8 seconds more of a gap to the front. Care to share a conspiracy theory or two why?
Maybe expand on the 90 degree V4 theory that Ducati have been trying to crack forever and how Honda managed it straight away? You could throw some light on the centroid triangle, weight distribution and the geometry benefits of having the output shaft sprocket in the right place too?
No..? I didn't think so.
I'll give you a clue, Mister everything I read must be taken literally..Rossi said there WAS improvement just like Hayden. More feel at the front tyre with the new frame. Unfortunately, that isn't the only problem Ducati have..thus the calls for major change, which most would take as a U-turn from the corporate blame game statements made pre Malaysia.
Hayden turning the odd decent lap in QP followed by another early in the race before his soft tyres disintegrated, does not equate to a good race pace. It's a red herring.
A smart man, reading between those lines, might question the validity of such a flawed practice strategy and reason that Sunday is all that matters with points at stake. Wiser to spend limited testing time improving your chances when it counts.
Not our Bulto though..Fk me, No again.
It's proof that the Ducati is only 1% off and more than likely, that 1% is down to Valentino Rossi being a useless old has been who took the bike from a winner to being shit and there's fk all wrong with the packaging of the motor, or the monocoque concept as Checa just proved?..Sorry, you never said that did you?
Your insight free and clueless assumption is truly gobsmacking Einstein.
