Why do I get the impression..
..that sensible, well structured comments praising Rossi and talking about his strengths get under your skin and lead you to have silly little fanboy hating digs all the time?
With the information we get nowadays..of course we'll be able to learn some more about the relative strengths and weaknesses of our main protaganist. Especially if we're keen students and are able to use our intelligence to read between the lines, and not get caught up in the type of bullshit I've outlined above !!
You tell us with such conviction that the M1 & RCV are equal..based on what? What Nostro says?
No..it's just an opinion that suits your agenda. We can all see how fast the Honda is and how it now goes around corners too. If it didn't Pedrosa wouldn't have done so well on it as he's probably the least adaptable/talented of the big four..in my opinion of course.
Comparing the electronics on a 12 year old two-stroke 500 to the bikes of today, to once again try and detract from Rossi, just illustrates what a saddo you are.
Closed loop intelligent corner by corner mapping, T/C, launch control, triple axis gyro wheelie control, fly-by-wire fkin rectum control?
..versus sprark plugs, coils and a stop switch?
Perhaps you can dig us out this Burgess link that seems to be more a figment of your imagination than anything to do with reality that you keep referring to?..then explain how it's all the same as todays bikes?
You may THINK they'd all be capable, while spouting that the likes of Biaggi & Gibernau were shit competition for Rossi, but they did it..and so did he.
Dumbing down bikes means dumbing up riders..and who fked off at the thought of that then sharp shit?