As your old Pal Nostro said to me recently.."Enough of these circular arguments."
Cal's a twat..Rossi's a loser..The RCV is no better than the M1.
I don't know about you..but I'm getting a bit sick and tired of every single thread descending into virtual war between the same old faces.
You lead with your chin, shit is gonna happen. Let's try and be a little less dogmatic about proceedings shall we?
I'm no big fan of Casey Stoners personality, but I will say this..
He won on that Honda because Stoner is/was Stoner. He did the same thing on a Ducati. Just because he managed to top the podium, doesn't make the bike he rode the best bike, or even as good as bikes he's beaten.
We have heard how he lost focus last year and made a wrong decision regards upgrading his machinery. This is a fact Pal, whether you like it or not. It's not the first time Stoners emotions got the better of him but..that's another argument and in the past.
Can you imagine what a focused and happy #27 would have done on the new bike?
As has been said and looking back in GP history, these things have a habit of going in cycles. Honda have won 2 titles in 10 years. Mr. Nakamoto has been employed to turn that unacceptable state of affairs around and appears to be doing a very good job.
Honda have the best bike. Simple. Nothing wrong with that, it's a big part of the sport..man AND machine. Without the manufacturer, riders wouldn't ride..they'd jog round the track.
It's not Boxing, Golf or Tennis.
So..rejoice in that fact, your team are doing good. But for the sake of a little more interesting and informative debate..Stop TELLING us something we know ain't true because of a silly agenda.