Your usual last resort
insults from your self elevated position of forum jury, here to judge everyone else, the only one with a valid opinion. When challenged, your arguments fold and you dish out the insults and attempted put downs
Christ man, even with all the cider you drink, you couldn't put down a decent fart
Just to remind you, you claimed Stoner jumped on a "finally sorted Honda" that Honda had thrown everything at to get that final 800 title. No way for you that Stoner made the difference to Honda, it had to be the superior bike they created for that last shot. By that argument you define the previous Hondas as inferior because no way could Stoner win on an inferior bike eh.
So if Lorenzo is losing to Pedrosa now because Pedrosa has a better bike, why wasn't Pedrosa losing to Lorenzo because Lorenzo had the better bike - as the M1 was widely acclaimed to be by just about everyone including Spalding, whose opinion you value.
Cal is a better rider than Bautista or Bradl, I agree, but by your argument shouldn't be beating them becasue of the bike he's on, as the rider can't bridge the deficit of the Yamaha to the Honda. Cal can do it but Lorenzo can't?
Pedrosa has always been fast. Finally he's been injury free and is making the most of it. For the second half of 2012 there was only him and Lorenzo in it for race wins apart from PI. You've stated on many occassions about the second half of 2010, Lorenzo rode conservatively to ensure his title - your opinion to devalue Stoner winning on the Ducati. But your opinion of 2012 differs again - I wonder why. A different agenda perhaps
You disregard anything that doesn't suit your purpose and have spun your argument that many times you haven't a clue when you're contradicting yourself.
It's credibility you've run out of son, not patience