Gixanator..Does wosi need to be a member of Casey's inner circle to put an opinion out on an MCN forum? It's hardly ground breaking stuff.
If you think racing MotoGP bikes can be separated from MotoGP politics, you're dumber than I thought. Casey said as much himself. To the anti-Rossisti, it's the very cornerstone of bitter complaint.
I'll leave it be when others STOP trying to belittle the most winning top class rider of all time, while referencing Stoner through graduated Red &Orange tinted specs..if that's alright with you Pal?
DF..The "rideability" bit didn't work..not for Casey anyway.
Hayden won a title with Honda and knew what a decent bike felt like. He said the softer and less manic the bike became with his input..the more it came towards him and away from Stoner.
F1 is a completely different game, although I agree with Ecclestone's view on Engineers. Don't let them get anywhere near the rulebook. By nature they are geeks, not interested in sport or entertainment and have a completely different agenda to riders and fans.
I'm not interested in tyres making Ducati's life more equitable. Everybody else has to work with the same material.
Why should Bridgestone have to spend millions developing a tyre that bails out their engineers?
Rossi had SNS exclusivity according to most fucko's. This was responsible for his dominance..part of the politics Gixinator wants to ignore.
Yet when Ducati & Stoner lose the same exclusivity, their results stop coming and they get beaten on an even playing field..it's change the fkin rules.
It's the most two-faced argument there is in GP..and another excuse.