HONDA XL650V TRANSALP (1987-2007) Review

Published: 24 November 2006

"Providing honest transport seemingly since the dawn of time"

Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Riding

"Providing honest transport seemingly since the dawn of time"

  • At a glance
  • 647cc  -  53 bhp
  • 46 mpg  -  190 miles range
  • Insurance group: 11 of 17
    Compare insurance quotes now
  • Medium seat height (843mm)

Overall Rating 3 out of 5

The Honda XL650V Transalp has been providing honest transport seemingly since the dawn of time. Revitalised with a bigger motor and a face-lift in 2000, it’s softly-chuffing charm and easy-going manners have won a devoted audience. Mostly blokes more interested in getting from A-to-B than having a giggle buy them up.

Ride Quality & Brakes 4 out of 5

Although there’s nothing special about the Honda XL650V Transalp's forks (unadjustable) or the shock (adjustable for compression damping only) the set-up works and lasts very well. It’s comfortable over tarmac and light dirt, handles a pillion with ease and only the weak brakes prevent you from exploiting its performance to the full.

Engine 3 out of 5

The carb-fed, SOHC V-twin of the Honda XL650V Transalp should struggle with a weighty 191kg to cart about, but actually it does it quietly and efficiently. It’s the same motor as the Deauville, but feels more fun in this sit-up-and-beg package. There’s decent pull and it’s only when you hit motorway speeds does it begin to feel the strain, with 90mph about as comfortably fast as you’re both happy to travel at.

Build Quality & Reliability 4 out of 5

The Honda XL650V Transalp's motor is very reliable. It’s in a soft state of tune and, provided it’s regularly serviced, should go on forever. The older 600cc should be checked closely for worn wheel bearings, the suspension bearings in the Pro-Link shock, rusty exhausts and loose or broken spokes.

Insurance, running costs & value 3 out of 5

Compared to BMW’s excellent F650S and F650GS the Honda XL650V Transalp seems somewhat overpriced and the GS is much more versatile, boasting genuinely better trail qualities. At the same price point, however, it falls down to which style you prefer, though the Honda is arguably the better road bike. Find a Honda XL650 Transalp for sale.

Insurance group: 11 of 17 – compare motorcycle insurance quotes now.

Equipment 2 out of 5

The Honda XL650V Transalp’s equipment level is fair – you do get an ignition-based immobiliser, but the bashplate’s plastic not metal and a centrestand’s only available as a factory option. Ideally you’d want the factory heated grips, taller screen and hard luggage in your deal.

Owners' Reviews

14 owners have reviewed their HONDA XL650V TRANSALP (1987-2007) and rated it in a number of areas. Read what they have to say and what they like and dislike about the bike below.

Review your HONDA XL650V TRANSALP (1987-2007)
Summary of Owners' Reviews
Overall Rating 4.1 out of 5
Ride Quality & Brakes 3.8 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Build Quality & Reliability 4.6 out of 5
Value & Running Costs 4.2 out of 5
Equipment 3.8 out of 5
3 out of 5

It been like a great, reliable if not slightly conservative marraige for me

04 March 2016 by Loves Adventure Riding

I am likely overly harsh when rating the bike overall, partly due to my requirements for a bike that would be positioned distinctly more in the off-road / 'scrambling' space than the Transalp was ever designed or intended for. Read more

Ride Quality & Brakes
4 out of 5
A very good all rounder. With the right tyres (I run a continental KTC80 on front and a Mitas E07 on the back (130 wide) I believe it delivers great handling on tar bends and maneuvering at reasonable speeds (140km/hr through to 160 km/hr), and offers good overall dirt handling on varied terrain including slower mountainous terrain (40 to 50 km/hr speeds) or good solid gravel and mild sand roads (130 to 155 km/hr speeds) - Brakes as standard are nothing special but do the job if you remain aware of there rather average delivery - Seat is right up there on the comfort scale for an enduro / adventure type bike - Overall range is slightly low for real hard core riding into Arica
Engine
5 out of 5
For a 650 enduro the engine is great - Good power and torque with reasonable responsiveness - Vibrations are not at all excessive with the twin - Durability if great and valve clearances hold firm for long durations (less need to constant maintenance) - I thing the gearing per se is THE BEST/SPOT ON, with 3rd gear offering you a range of 40km/hr throught to 120 km/hr if you happy to let the revs range a bit
Build Quality & Reliability
4 out of 5
Its rugged, tough, robust and easy to work on. I believe there is a price to pay for the 'solid' build in the bikes total weight and tendency (particularly in old models like mine) to sit heavy and low [sometimes feel like I'm riding a tank] - A little corrosion occurring on the frame close to the battery in the last 4 years. - The speedo/odo tends to fail periodically due to geared part situated in the front wheel axle/hub mechanism - this particular part wearing too easily and appears to be made of some plastic composite.
Value & Running Costs
4 out of 5
I cant give an annual number above as it really depends on how much riding i am doing. I think the costs are reasonable and particularly good value if you are willing to fit aftermarket non-genuine Honda parts for the most which I am.
Equipment
4 out of 5
All in all happy with most aspects Front shocks (and probably suspension overall) is not quite what I think it should be particulalry if you wish to ride the bike hard offroad. Original tyres are poor in my view
4 out of 5

Trustworthy...

26 January 2016 by SJD65

Wonderfully easy to ride, if a little underpowered midrange I bought this bike 2yrs ago as a workhorse/commuter (150mils+ aweek main roads/town). My other bike is a '94' GSXR1100WP (you see why I needed a commuter) and I didn't expect to 'love' this... Read more bike...but I do! I guess I'm a bit criticall of the power delivery as I'm used to the 'rush' of the GSXR putting 156bhp down at the wheel, but this little Honda has me smiling for all the right reasons. Its solid, reliable, and cheap to run, all ive done in 18000 miles is basic servicing, chain and sprockets and a clutch, it never misses a beat, but one small critisiem would be that even though my version has the 'better headlight' it's rubbish, I live in a rural area, national speedlimit roads, high banks and no lighting, and the Honda is no where near the GSXR in the hedlamp area...but I guess a couple of after market spotlamps on the engine bars, is a small price to pay.

Ride Quality & Brakes
4 out of 5
Breaks can feel a little less 'sharp' than I would like
Engine
4 out of 5
Plenty of power and reliable, but no'rush'..but then thats not what its built for
Build Quality & Reliability
5 out of 5
V twin Honda....enough said
Value & Running Costs
5 out of 5
-
Equipment
4 out of 5
The ability to switch the lights off would be good, but equipment levels are atcually very good.
4 out of 5

great buy!

06 October 2015 by Railway Red

I bought this Transalp as a daily commute bike. it replaces my XJ900 diversion which I hated from day one. but wow, commuting became fun now! enough power for the motorway, excellent in town and on rural backroads and I even have the option of taking... Read more a part off-road route on my way to work now! corners real easy, sits comfy and makes the ride a pleasant thing to do! only thing I dislike is the sound and looks of the standard exhaust...

Ride Quality & Brakes
3 out of 5
Brakes are a bit poor...
Engine
4 out of 5
-
Build Quality & Reliability
4 out of 5
check the cdi's placement on early models!
Value & Running Costs
4 out of 5
-
Equipment
4 out of 5
I've added a centerstand, heated grips and different windscreen. I would've like a little clock in the dash too...
5 out of 5

Almost perfect for what its meant for

25 April 2014 by markxzx

I have to confess a liking for these machines, amongst many others bikes I have owned, I am about to buy my fourth Transalp! You need to take the machine in perspective though, it isn't going to challenge a big GS, or a Pan European, or an R1, but... Read more then it isn't meant to. What it is is a reliable, economical, comfortable, gentle all rounder. I have never had mechanical problems with one of these, and I've done a lot of miles on them. I'm tall, so find them comfortable. The handling is ok, the suspension isn't budget rubbish and seems to last well. Equipment and weather protection is good, compared to the beemer parallel twins and the 800 tiger. It doesn't have the performance of those machines, but then is cheaper to buy and run. My only criticism is finish quality. My first two Transalps were Jap built 600s, had a hard life and stood up well. The 650 is Euro built, and the difference shows if you don't look after them. I've seen far, far worse finishes on budget four cylinder bikes though. Oh, and it has a really annoying restrictor in the tank that makes it a pain in the fundament to fill up, really slow. Economy and range is pretty good though. Doesn't have the grunt for long motorway hauls, but then motorways and bikes = boredom. Shouldn't you be on a more interesting route? The smaller the road gets, the more sense it makes. Great through traffic too, that 21" front wheel keeps it nimble and stable. And there is proper road rubber available for it, which I prefer to fit than the semi triallie stuff. So, you want practicality, these are pretty hard to beat.

Ride Quality & Brakes
4 out of 5
-
Engine
5 out of 5
-
Build Quality & Reliability
4 out of 5
-
Value & Running Costs
4 out of 5
-
Equipment
4 out of 5
-
3 out of 5

Great Bike

27 December 2013 by shuey

I owned a 2003 Transalp for about 4 months and the only reason I changed is because of the lack of power. I done a run from Derry N.Ireland to salou(down through France)on it and found the seat very hard. A great commuter but take it to 100mph and... Read more it feels like its about to lay down,If you want the Transalp looks and luggage capability go for the Varadero 1000

Ride Quality & Brakes
4 out of 5
-
Engine
4 out of 5
-
Build Quality & Reliability
5 out of 5
-
Value & Running Costs
3 out of 5
-
Equipment
5 out of 5
-
4 out of 5

Say's on the can.

21 September 2011 by Bucephalus

I bought a 2005 Tranny as a second/ winter bike especially to explore the backwaters of N.Wales, however, I currently live in London but intend relocate 2012 on retirement. I use the bike to commute in London and up to Wales on a regular basis and... Read more personally rate this bike highly. I also own a Harley Davidson and a Scott Flying Squirrel, and speak as a life long biker. I intend to change things to better suit my needs which will have no significance to the next reader, so, all next readers please view YouTube: TransAlp 650 Long Way Dany. A most inspirational 4 minutes which say's it better than I ever will.

Ride Quality & Brakes
3 out of 5
-
Engine
3 out of 5
-
Build Quality & Reliability
4 out of 5
-
Value & Running Costs
3 out of 5
-
Equipment
3 out of 5
-
4 out of 5

Great Bike

22 May 2010 by Anonymous

Spent 18 months commuting M4 into London, all weather, never let me down.Comfortable riding position/visibility, you can see the 4 wheeled idiots texting, reading and doing there make-up, well in advance. Then out at the weekend into the country... Read more 2-up.

Ride Quality & Brakes
3 out of 5
-
Engine
4 out of 5
-
Build Quality & Reliability
5 out of 5
-
Value & Running Costs
4 out of 5
-
Equipment
2 out of 5
-
4 out of 5

Ideal bike

23 February 2008 by StumpyFingers

I got this in December because it felt right, not to heavy and comfortable riding position. It goes like a tractor just plodding along putting a smile on my face. It does not have a high sustainable top speed, but at the legal speeds it is... Read more comfortable.

Ride Quality & Brakes
4 out of 5
-
Engine
4 out of 5
-
Build Quality & Reliability
5 out of 5
-
Value & Running Costs
5 out of 5
-
Equipment
4 out of 5
-
4 out of 5

Not at all bad.

06 January 2008 by colinamarsh

I've have had the XL650 now for two months.I have ridden it in the worst weather Scotland has to offer and it has coped with it all no problem .Took it up into the Lammermuirs today with a pillion onboard and it did everything i asked of it. Starts... Read more first time and behaves well. It doesnt have too much grunt but you dont buy a Transalp for muscle power. You buy it for its staying power. Overall a very good hard working bike.

Ride Quality & Brakes
4 out of 5
-
Engine
4 out of 5
-
Build Quality & Reliability
5 out of 5
-
Value & Running Costs
5 out of 5
-
Equipment
3 out of 5
-
4 out of 5

Outstanding Bike

15 May 2007 by sj_edinburgh

I thought I add a few comments on the 600, which was built until 2000. I bought this bike after owning bikes like VFR800, Hornet 600 etc. What a revelation! On paper this bike is a disappointment, not a lot of power, quite heavy. Ignore the specs,... Read more this a great bike, more than the sum of it parts. Sure it struggles at illegal speeds, but get to 60/70 pretty quickly, won't scare you in process and is the BEST town and B-road bike I've ridden (out of about 30). So easy to ride, great to blasting on country lanes and the steering geometry allow you to brake (lightly) midcorner if you overcook it. Engine note is quite good and build quality very good. Can't think of many negative to be honest, maybe too tall for some and useless on motorways, but apart from that a great bike.

Ride Quality & Brakes
4 out of 5
-
Engine
3 out of 5
-
Build Quality & Reliability
4 out of 5
-
Value & Running Costs
4 out of 5
-
Equipment
4 out of 5
-
Read all 14 owners' reviews in full

Facts & Figures

Model info
Year introduced 1987
Year discontinued 2007
Original price £5,249
Used price -
Warranty term (when new) Two year unlimited mileage
Running costs
Insurance group 11 of 17
Annual road tax £82
Annual service cost -
Performance
Max power 53 bhp
Max torque 41 ft-lb
Top speed 110 mph
1/4-mile acceleration 12 secs
Average fuel consumption 46 mpg
Tank range 190 miles
Specification
Engine size 647cc
Engine type 6v V-twin, 5 gears
Frame type Ally twin spar
Fuel capacity 19 litres
Seat height 843mm
Bike weight 191kg
Front suspension None
Rear suspension Compression
Front brake Twin 256mm discs
Rear brake 240mm disc
Front tyre size 90/90 x 21
Rear tyre size 120/90 x 17

History & Versions

Model history

1987: Honda debuts its Transalp 600V. Off-road styling, 583cc single cylinder motor, single front disc.
1994: Revised with new fairing and better instruments.
2000: Another revision; 647cc motor, new shock, twin front discs, HISS ignition-based immobiliser.
2006: Sleeker design, black wheel rims, better, brighter headlight.
2008: Honda XL650V Transalp deleted to be replaced by all new XL700V Transalp (see seperate review).

Other versions

None.

Photo Gallery

  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Riding
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Side view
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Riding
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Front view
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Rear view
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Side view
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Riding
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Riding
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Brakes
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Exhaust
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Instruments
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Engine
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Riding
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Riding
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Side view
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Riding
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Front view
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Rear view
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Side view
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Riding
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Riding
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Brakes
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Exhaust
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Instruments
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Engine
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review
  • Honda XL650V Transalp motorcyce review - Riding
All related reviews