Yamaha XJ600 Diversion Review (1992-2004)

Highlights

  • Dependable, comfortable bike
  • Cheap, versatile and useful
  • Extremely popular secondhand purchase

At a glance

Owners' reliability rating: 4.4 out of 5 (4.4/5)
Annual servicing cost: £80
Power: 61 bhp
Seat height: Low (30.3 in / 770 mm)
Weight: Medium (401 lbs / 182 kg)

Overall rating

Next up: Ride & brakes
3 out of 5 (3/5)

The Yamaha XJ600 Diversion is a Vauxhall Astra diesel amongst motorcycles… with all the worthiness (and dreariness) that implies. Designed from the outset to be soft, cheap, versatile, simple and novice-friendly, the curiously-named Yamaha XJ600 Diversion is pleasant, predictable and a useful hack. But note the complete absence of the words ‘desire’, ‘excitement’, ‘performance’ or ‘thrills’.

However, as time has gone on and bikes have been put to the test over countless miles, the 'Divvy', as the Diversion became known, proved a reliable and capable workhorse.

Originally launched in 1992, the first XJ600 Diversion was a no-frills budget commuter that used an air/oil-cooled, inline-four engine with a two-valve head design and a tubular steel chassis. Anything but sophisticated, it was a cheap and reliable form of transport that got on with the job without capturing many headlines.

Yamaha XJ600 Diversion in the Alps

It wasn’t a naked street fighter like the original Bandit 600, far more a simple, novice-friendly and uncomplicated bike that was useful, if not exciting in any way. But the Diversion found its own niche and shied away from the middleweight battle. Generally overlooked by anyone apart from those searching for a budget bargain, the Diversion was eventually phased out in 2004. However, very soon Yamaha realised the error of their ways…

There's a thriving online community for the Diversion so once you've read this review and our vast suite of owners' reviews, why not head to somewhere like the Yamaha Diversion Owners' Club on Facebook.

Ride quality & brakes

Next up: Engine
3 out of 5 (3/5)

Again, the Yamaha XJ600 Diversion is adequate and novice-friendly rather than in any way inspiring or exciting. But as versatile, first-big-bike-type transport, the Divvy delivers the necessaries. The suspension is rather basic and the brakes a little soft, but it steers sweetly and the ride is good for two.

Yamaha XJ600 Diversion in blue

Engine

Next up: Reliability
4 out of 5 (4/5)

The Yamaha XJ600 Diversion is softer than a marshmallow in a swimming pool. But then, that’s the way it was meant to be. Purpose-designed aircooled four is mechanically bullet and idiot proof and pretty much the same to use. Don’t go hunting for power bands – there aren’t any.

But the Yamaha XJ600 Diversion purrs around without a glitch quite happily and lasts forever. Looks a bit like an old classic Honda engine thanks to its sweeping downpipes and extensive cooling fins, too…

Inline 600s are a rare beast these days with most manufacturers choosing economical parallel-twin configurations in their middleweights instead so there's a certain retro charm to the Yam.

Yamaha XJ600 Diversion engine

Reliability & build quality

Next up: Value
4 out of 5 (4/5)

The Yamaha XJ600 Diversion was built to endure rather than impress. So steel proliferates over alloy, chunkiness over finery and straightforward, simple mechanicals over high tech. It works, too. Not much goes wrong with the Yamaha XJ600 Diversion and mileages the wrong side of 50,000 are fairly common.

The XJ600’s two-valve engine is very robust so treat any signs of oil weeps or smoking when cold as a warning. If it sounds sweet and the gearbox works, you should be fine.

Our extensive Yamaha XJ 600 owners' reviews show loads of extremely satisfied owners, some having covered hundreds of thousands of miles on their bikes.

Yamaha XJ600 Diversion right side

Value vs rivals

Next up: Equipment
3 out of 5 (3/5)

In truth, not much comes close. No other four is as purpose-built for novices as the Yamaha XJ600 Diversion and they were cheap new, and are even better value second hand. The biggest thing against it are its looks and comprehensive lack of excitement. In that respect, a decent Bandit does everything the Yamaha XJ600 Diversion does, but with added thrills, for the same money.

If you were looking to buy a new bike that does a similar job to a Yamaha XJ600, A Yamaha Tracer 7, Kawasaki Versys 650 or Suzuki V-Strom 650 wouldn't be far off the money. Closer in feel engine-wise would be the 4-cylinder Honda CB650R, but that is much more expensive and powerful.

Yamaha XJ600 Diversion left side

Equipment

3 out of 5 (3/5)

Not much to write home about but first time big bikers or couriers (cos they love em too) won’t find much to complain about with the Yamaha XJ600 Diversion. The mirrors mirror, the instruments inform, the switchgear has everything in the right place… just like a Vauxhall Astra diesel, in fact…

There are plenty of aftermarket modifications available, with enough Yamaha XJ600 parts on offer to build a Cafe Racer or a similarly big project.

Specs

Engine size 599cc
Engine type 8v transverse four, 5 gears
Frame type Steel tube double cradle
Fuel capacity 17 litres
Seat height 770mm
Bike weight 182kg
Front suspension None
Rear suspension Preload
Front brake 2 x 320mm discs
Rear brake 245mm disc
Front tyre size 110/80 x 17
Rear tyre size 130/70 x 18

Mpg, costs & insurance

Average fuel consumption 52 mpg
Annual road tax £84
Annual service cost £80
New price -
Used price -
Insurance group 9 of 17
How much to insure?
Warranty term Two year unlimited mileage

Top speed & performance

Max power 61 bhp
Max torque 34 ft-lb
Top speed 117 mph
1/4 mile acceleration 12.5 secs
Tank range 165 miles

Model history & versions

Model history

1992: Yamaha XJ600 Diversion launched.
1993: Yamaha XJ600 Diversion gets new fairing with air scoops, screen now has grey trim.
1994: New Diversion logo on fairing.
1996: Yamaha XJ600 Diversion gets oil cooler. New carburettor. New fairing with indicators mounted on the sides. New headlamp. Choke now mounted on left handlebar. Redesigned bar end weights. Reshaped side panels.
1997: New fork leg protectors. Now with hazard warning light switch. New seat.
1998: Revised centre stand. New 41mm (from 38mm) front forks.
2004: Yamaha XJ600 Diversion discontinued.

Owners' reviews for the YAMAHA XJ600 DIVERSION (1992 - 2004)

45 owners have reviewed their YAMAHA XJ600 DIVERSION (1992 - 2004) and rated it in a number of areas. Read what they have to say and what they like and dislike about the bike below.

Review your YAMAHA XJ600 DIVERSION (1992 - 2004)

Summary of owners' reviews

Overall rating: 4 out of 5 (4/5)
Ride quality & brakes: 3.7 out of 5 (3.7/5)
Engine: 4.1 out of 5 (4.1/5)
Reliability & build quality: 4.4 out of 5 (4.4/5)
Value vs rivals: 4.2 out of 5 (4.2/5)
Equipment: 3.4 out of 5 (3.4/5)
Annual servicing cost: £80
3 out of 5 Predictable and reliable
12 December 2023 by Bobert

Year: 1992

A good first bike or winter hack. Smooth linear throttle makes the bike very predictable and not snatchy about tow. Fairing gives decent protection. Simple bike to own and operate. Regularly get 55 to 60 mpg.

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5

For the most part it feels good through the Twisties and can sit around 70 without too much effort. Very comfortable with a mostly upright riding position. I find the front brake a bit on the soft side. However, mine only has a single disc , twin discs are standard so would expect better performance .

Engine 4 out of 5

Not the most powerful but reliable as they come. Throttle is linear and predictable. At 7000rpm it's really comes alive.

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

So far, nothing has required any attention beyond standard servicing. Only small grumble is the mirror stems come loose regularly and need constant tightening.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Cheap as chips to buy. Rarely cost more than £1000 - £1500 for a good example. Simple to work on and very well supported in the forums.

Equipment 2 out of 5

Does a manual choke count as equipment? It's a 1992 so expect Spartan levels of tech.

Buying experience: Bought private for £900. The guy was meticulous.

5 out of 5 Great little bike a shame they don't make them quite like this anymore
22 July 2022 by Bolt!

Year: 1999

Only had the bike a few months but feel like its a solid thing, basic but so far seems reliable and well put together. I like how easy it is to ride, easy to get parts for and handles a pillion no problem despite the low power output, doesn't stand out in a crowd or get any looks but I like that about it, just goes about being a generally good all round practical and economical motorcycle and cheap to buy too. Suspension feels a bit budget and the gear change a little clunky at times but this doesn't detract from it in any way for me. I'm quite short and find I get a bit of wind buffeting my head but a better helmet and a small windscreen deflector has mostly sorted that, perhaps a touring screen might sort it completely.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Front brake is surprisingly effective and stops the bike really well, back brake pretty standard. Front suspension a little bumpy at times but does all you ask of it after all its not a super sport.

Engine 5 out of 5

Ok it's not got loads of go but is torquey enough and still has a useful enough turn of speed if needed and whilst traffic is quicker these days it still does alright. Also does fine two up. Engine seems ideal for commuting and relaxed riding, I like it.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

No complaints so far a 23 year old bike so expect some wear and tear but has aged quite well. Not too much to go wrong thankfully as I'm mechanically inept, feel like the bike will take me anywhere I want to go without too much fuss.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Hasn't cost much so far, replaced the awful open ended can and needed a new front tyre otherwise its been a case of just fill up and go. Could probably eek out 160+ miles to a tank . Cheap to insure.

Equipment 5 out of 5

It has all you need although a fuel gauge and clock would be nice, I like the analogue clocks and the 90's feel to it, simple uncluttered and easy to use.

Buying experience: Bought privately, chap seemed nice, think we did OK. Full MOT and history with luggage and rack for £750, can't buy a decent 125 for that!

4 out of 5 A damn good bike
16 July 2021 by David McDonald

Version: XJ600N DIVERSION

Year: 1997

I bought the xj600 in 2014. It was what i could afford at the the time and i had no expectations of it being exceptional. I still have the bike at present. I have owned supposedly more desirable bikes since i bought the xj but none have proved to be as reliable and an all round good bike as the xj. It is not super fast, nor does it handle like a sports bike.It is however an exceptional all rounder which you grow to appreciate every day you own it. Sits all day at 60 mph returns 65 mpg while doing so. Parts are readily available and reasonably priced. In my opinion this bike is very underestimated. It does everything an everday rider would want. It commutes, it tours and it is a very reliable bike.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5

Buying experience: The bike was bought privately.

5 out of 5 XJ600 Cafe Racer/ Dirt Bike fully restored and modded
11 April 2021 by Mickey Flynn

Version: Custom, fully stripped and rebuilt with all brand new service parts

Year: 2002

Annual servicing cost: £100

Having owned over 20 other previous vehicles over the last 45 years, sports cars, normal cars, a few estates, four 3 ton vans and five other bikes large and small, this little XJ600 2002 reg divvy is a classic reliable workhorse, I picked it up for £900 second hand and spent about £1,500 overhauling it so I now have an economical little run around that to me now feels like a brand new bike.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5

I gave up being a speed freak after selling my V12 jag,V6 3.2 RS ford & Vmax many moons ago, 598 cc is plenty fast enough for me to keep within the national speed limit to ride anywhere all day long.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Being a 600cc it's fairly reasonable on insurance, all the bearings, disks, brake pads, pistons, seals, chain & sprockets have already been re-newed last year and as I only use this bike for the odd local trip every now and then hopefully it won't need anything major done to it except for another oil & filter change when I've clocked up another 6/7 K on it

Equipment 5 out of 5

I've got this bike fitted with Continental Twinduros back & front, great tyres for where I live up a one track country lane. I also changed the rear sprocket for a 45 tooth cog, made a shedload of difference in dropping the revs throughout all the gears. I also added my own fabricated pannier rack thats fitted with 2 x 50 ltr canvas panniers and a 25 ltr hold all that I bungie over the top, can now use my bike to collect my weekly shop from tescos.

Buying experience: Purchased from Bulldog Superbike November 2019 for £900 2nd hand with only 20k on the clock, it was in a fairly dire well used condition, but I bought it especially as a winter project to rebuild.

5 out of 5 Very underestimated little bike
03 October 2020 by Motormouse

Version: Diversion S

Year: 2003

Annual servicing cost: £90

If you buy a XJ600 and expect it to be a R6 you will be very disappointed, but it's a very underestimated little bike, I have had mine from new and the only thing that has gone wrong is a leak from the oil cooler, was a bit pricey to replace as you can only get an OEM part, funny how there is a pattern part for the XJ900 at half the price but other than that you just service it and ride it, it's cheap and simple to service it yourself, there is no computers or fuel injection so you don't need any special tools, so if you want a great simple bike you can cut your teeth on I can recommend this one, I would be very reluctant to sell mine.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

The ride quality if fine I have done 175 non stop on her and I have been fine, the brakes are fine, I have the double disc model, you notice that there is a lot of fine here and in the over comments, but that the type of bike it is, it's fine, does everything you ask of it as long as you don't expect too much but she will always get you home.

Engine 5 out of 5

The performance is fine for an engine that just 60 BHP, there are modern cars now that can give you a run for your money, but there having to pay £60K plus for the privilege.

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

I don't ride mine in the worst of the winter so she has held up well, never broken down and even when the oil cooler sprang a small leak while on holiday on her, I just had to buy a 1 ltr can of oil to keep her topped up and kept on riding.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Well it £90 max if you do it yourself, and I have had 70 MPG providing you not too heavy with the right wrist.

Equipment 4 out of 5

I has just standard clocks, no gear indicator or fuel gauge, but fit the best tyres that you can afford and she will handle well.

Buying experience: Bought it new from a dealer that is no longer in existence, it was one of the last bikes made so got it for £3200.

5 out of 5 Fantastic all rounder for new and experienced riders.
02 July 2020 by Shakeyjake

Version: XJ600S Diversion

Year: 1993

Annual servicing cost: £150

Basic but fantastic, I bought mine after 3 years without any motorbike. It seemed a little daunting to jump straight back in on a 600 but it was gentle enough while I found my ryhthm again. Since then I've had this bike alongside other newer and faster bikes 1000+cc machines and I kept hold of it because it has never once failed to put a smile on my face taking it out on a run regardless of the weather.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

I took my bike for a week long touring trip a couple of years ago fully loaded with tools I never needed to use, I can happily sit all day long on the bike with no discomfort. The back brake is particularly good and I generally do most of my braking on the rear anyway. The front brake is perfectly capable but they did upgrade to twin front disks on later models for further improvement. I find the suspension to be a happy medium, not soft enough to be bouncing around on rough surfaces but soft enough to keep wrists and back happy.

Engine 5 out of 5

They are notoriously rattly engines but don't let that fool you into thinking something is wrong. As engines go it's as simple as they come for a straight 4 and the fact that it gets so little stress in it's set up means as long as it's maintained it will run forever. There's a lot of mention of it being boring in the official MCN review by comparison to the higher strung competition, but I find the mid range of the engine to be great fun, plenty of usable power. There's a lot of satisfaction in giving the engine a good work out on twisty roads while still being perfectly capable on motorways and effortless in town.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

One of very few bikes I've had that I could take out on a big trip with only simple tools and puncture repair kits and still have complete faith that it won't let me down.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Exposed engine means oil and filters can be done by anyone with a socket set so very easy. If you're hands on with other maintenance, brakes, tyres and drive train are simple jobs keeping costs down and nothing high tech keeping parts cost down.

Equipment 3 out of 5

The stock headlight is a big pitfall, it is about as useful as a candle but there are plenty of more effective solutions to lighting your path. In it's stock form the bike is as stripped back as they come, you get a speedo, a tacho, neutral and oil pressure light. If you want lots of tech with your bike this isn't the one. Mine has the addition of heated grips, dashboard clock and 12v charger. Besides that I generally don't want much else on a bike.

4 out of 5 Diversion ahead.
11 May 2020 by Peter Lockwood

Version: faired

Year: 1993

Annual servicing cost: £30

No nonsense transport easy to keep on the road ,benign power delivery, soft suspension gives comfort ride, leisurely braking wont scare you either.I like this bike but then I am 65.

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5

Ride has a soggy feel and brakes likewise, but I am getting on a bit now so I prefer the comfort.

Engine 4 out of 5

Wont ever scare you ,good spread of power, has a rough patch mid range but smoothes out nicely around 60 ish.

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

Basic to the point of primitive almost,means though it is user friendly when it comes to repairs and routine maintenance. I do my own spannering so simplicity is a plus point.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Above is cost of oil and filter, other consumables as required.

Equipment 3 out of 5

There isnt any equipment,a fuel gauge would have been welcome.

Buying experience: Even from a dealer can be bought cheaply,I was lucky to get one with low miles for £1200, get the best you can find , a lot of these have had a hard life .

4 out of 5 Solid Divvy
14 November 2019 by Sean G

Version: S

Year: 2003

Annual servicing cost: £50

Boring but rock solid

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5

Brakes are good now with twin discs upfront,boring trouble ,comfortable router or commuter

Engine 5 out of 5

100000 miles plus easy achievable with regular oil changes, predictable solid,easy to work on,cheap, simple

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Very reliable,easy to work on,cheap to maintain,nothing really goes wrong

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Secondhand bikes can be picked up very cheap,cheap basic good bike

Equipment 3 out of 5

Everything you need no more

Buying experience: Bought privately bargain of the century

4 out of 5 Never regretted owning the Divvi
03 July 2018 by TheKopite

Version: S

Year: 1999

Annual servicing cost: £100

Rock-solid, reliable, easy-to-maintain and so cheap to run. If you can find a well kept one, don't hesitate to buy. Fantastic as a commuter, just goes and goes. Not the most punchy engine, but with enough power for everyday use. Fantastic fuel and tank range. I can see why so many people love this bike.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Quite comfy and brakes have just enough bite to make you feel secure.

Engine 5 out of 5

Hard as nails. Just look after it, regular oil + filter changes.

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

Starts on the button EVERY TIME. Center stand was the first to corrode, easy welding fixed that. Watch for oil cooler problems, though this can be easily taken off. Just upgrade oil and keep going...

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

All low costs and easy enough for any novice to do majority themselves.

Equipment 3 out of 5

All the basics you need.

4 out of 5 Separates the Men from the Boys
11 July 2017 by Alan Clarke

Version: S

Year: 1996

I like the adjustable handlebars, from cruiser (ish) to racer (ish). Wish my 170mph Thunderace had height adjustable handlebars to suit my riding mood! I say it separates the men from the boys as the men appreciate it as a good all rounder with good acceleration - the 1/4 mile figure here is better than the Ducati Monster 800 of the same year and other acclaimed bikes. Although not as flash looking as superbikes non motorcycling friends say it looks good. The boys however, say things like "Yawn, it's an Astra diesel" to make out they spend all their days off leading the pack in motogp races.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

Thought £18 for a yamaha fuel filter was a bit dear compared to car fuel filter. But who came up with the myth that jap bikes are cheap

Equipment 4 out of 5

I like the adjustable handlebars

Buying experience: Bought from a nice chap

5 out of 5 Dependable old bike
05 July 2017 by Ash

Version: S Faired

Year: 1999

Annual servicing cost: £50

Its a dependable old hack that just keeps on going...

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5

The shock is a bit saggy these days, so looking to replace soon with a Fazer 600 one. But other than that it does what you ask of it. Breaks are ok, they stop you when you need but nothing to write home about.

Engine 5 out of 5

Its bulletproof engine, and really picks up in 4th after 50mph, about 5k revs. But for pootaling back and forth to work and back its just fine. Motorway speeds are capable and the XJ does alright in this respect.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Costs £50 a year in servicing for plugs filters and oil etc, i do all the work myself these days to keep the garage fees down to a minimum. These bikes are so easy to work on its untrue!

Equipment 5 out of 5

These bikes are very basic, but this is a plus for me, as I work on the bike myself so its easier to work on (No overcomplicated electrics) Currently running Conti Go's and there just fine. Stick a Givi Monorack or wingrack and box and our ready to tour.

Buying experience: Bought Privatly for £600 with 35k on the clock

4 out of 5 5 divvies and a few hundred thousand miles later still the MOST BORING bike in the World
08 February 2017 by Geff

Year: 1997

I despatched these bikes in London and then went touring france with wife and camping kit onboard and they cruised nicely at 90mph when ever and how long l wanted. with120,000 miles in 2 years on my first one, the only problems l had were that stupid clutch rattle and a split shock /swinging arm fixing mount where the shock gave out around 100,000

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

it did what it did and l only ever had one incident where some one walked into me at 30mph SO i would say the brakes and handling were good in town. when touring l would keep having to change up and down from top gear just to keep waking the wife up where she would have a snooze.

Engine 5 out of 5

lt was a work horse and did what l asked of it without complaining. it was not a GSXR or an R6 but there again it would not scare the life out of you like my graphite R6 did

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Again the only problem l had was the shock /swinging arm fixing mount splitt through a knackered shock

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

always had the bike serviced at 5,000 miles due to my job equalling 12 times a year and the most costly item was my battle axes

Equipment 4 out of 5

bridgestone battle axe, top box and a set of crash bars were all that was needed for miles of fun and entertainment

Buying experience: l find that when sourcing parts most people dont know the differences between the S & N or the changes around 1997 time so you are arguing with dealers who have been in the trade for 30 years who know best or ebayers who think one seat fits all years or double and single disc front end bits are interchangable

5 out of 5 Never mind the power bands - enjoy the bike for what it is.
29 August 2016 by Jonesy

Version: S

Year: 1998

Annual servicing cost: £100

Excellent bike bike learner. More than enough power and hey, who needs power bands when this delivers the power smoothly right across the gears. Its enough to get you well over the ton and that should be enough for anyone on UK roads.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

I have the twin front disc brake which works a dream. Rear is a bit spongly but does the job. Seat is cmfortable for 100 plus miles but most bikes, no matter what seat they have will demand a brak around this mileage nyway so its no better or worse than other similar bikes.

Engine 5 out of 5

Pretty much bullet proof if you do the regular servicing. It offers no scares for new riders as the power is delivered smoothly right across the gears. This suits me as I like to know that I wont hit a spot where the power kicks in and gets me into trouble! cruises all day at 70-80, which is more or less legal. But it does have enough guts left for that little bit extra if you need it. I do sometimes find myself looking for an extra gear when cruising but thats my only criticism.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

In truth nothing much goes wrong with these unless misused, abused or trashd which is not what they were made for in the first place. Keeps well as long as you dont leave it wet after a run. Never broken down. Only parts replaced are the usual, tyres, chain etc.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

If you do the servicing yourself, then its just the cost of the parts, say £40 tops. I dont have the tools for a chain change so take it to my local garage so say £100 in all.

Equipment 5 out of 5

Use Bridgestone BT 45 Battleax tyres which seem to suit it well enough. Had a scare on the Dunlop tyre it came with so changed those out after much research to the BT 45.

Buying experience: Bought from a dealer used with one previous owner from new.

5 out of 5
25 March 2016 by Alberto Sebellin Netherlands

Year: 1999

Perfect bike to go on long distance on vacation, just went to Nordkap from Rotterdam in 1995 and the way back, absolutely perfect. Bear in mind the speed limit in Sweden, Norway and Finland, no need to dive more then 120 km/h when allowed.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Brakes are very good changed the original lines for braided alternatives which are much better now they react very fast and strong. Suspension is ok, changed with oil that is a little bit more dense. For travelling this is very comfortable with the girlfriend and fully loaded GiVi 35 x 2 bags

Engine 5 out of 5

Bullet proof, and I changed the original exahust with a much better 4 in 1 for better pushing at low revs

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

I have changed the battery to a modern gel one and sealed all front connectors to be rainproof just in case.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

I do all serviceing myself; oil change, etc etc

Equipment 2 out of 5

I adjusted the GiVi frame with two strong carbon fibre plates to the XJ standard attachments frame bolt solving the problem to find some equipment, added a higher front windshield, this is still available on the market, and changed the original blinker with four mini indicators.

Buying experience: I bought from a dealer and it was a quite good price, I am the second owner.

4 out of 5 Jack of all Trades For £700
05 December 2015 by cchapman

Year: 1994

The bike is a jack of all trades. I mainly used this as a winter hack. Engine is bullet proof. The bike does lose out one sex appeal and excitement. If you going do a lot of miles and or riding in all weathers, it will get you there.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

The bike is a work horse. It turn of a dime but don't expect to flying round twist and turns at speed. The soft suspension soaks up the pot holes and the seat has plenty of comfort.

Engine 5 out of 5

You wont find a power band on this bike, but a steady increase. Low to maintain and a simple build. If you looking to do your own tinkering its a good engine to start with.

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

Engine is bullet proof and electrical problems are rare (mostly solved by cleaning the electrical contacts). A issue I have had twice is the rear suspension weld has broken twice (very scary) a rear shock cover is a must.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

put petrol and your good to go.

Equipment 3 out of 5

It's a budget bike and you won't find many things to rave bout.

3 out of 5 Good starter bike - gets boring really fast
27 September 2015 by tintin

Year: 2000

Annual servicing cost: £35

In terms of quality, it should probably have 4 or even 5 out of 5 stars, but the fact that its about as exciting as a watching paint dry it only gets 3 from me.

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5

Soft, so comfortable. Would like it a bit more firm to make it more fun in the twisties. Extremely un-exciting to ride. Brakes bite well enough, at least on the ones with double discs up front.

Engine 3 out of 5

Very mellow. Needs to be kept at 5k rpm before you really have any power, the real fun starts at around 7500 rpm. Lacking bottom end power.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Do an oil change before every season and it'll last forever.

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

Usually manage around 4-4,5 liters of fuel for a 100 km. The only service ever really necessary is a annual oil change and filter every other year.

Equipment 3 out of 5

Not really sure, the bikes are getting old now so don't think there is as much equipment to get for them anymore. Never really looked for upgrades though.

Buying experience: Bought from private seller and got a mint condition for reasonable price. My first bike and overall happy with it, but it has to be said I'm ready to move on to something more exciting after just one season on this.

5 out of 5
02 September 2015 by pete

Year: 1992

ok

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
4 out of 5 Good little bike
13 April 2014 by Leighj0121

I owned this bike being on the full throttle all the time had 130mph out of this was a very good bike apart from the weight which is unbelievably hard to take corners or hold in slow traffic but still overall good bike 4**

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 Good first big bike
05 March 2013 by ChayD

Can't really compare to other big bikes as it;s the first one I've ridden having converted from 125s. Wasn't really as big a step up as I'd imagined which was a pleasant surprise, and it's nice to have that bit of extra power, even if it's not a crotch rocket; being able to accelerate to 70 without having to have a good tailwind and a steep downhill slope whilst the little 125 engine bounces off its rev limiter is a refreshing change. I should imagine it would get boring after a few months but still, it's fun for now...

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 3 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
3 out of 5 Yamma Divvy
10 January 2013 by Detonation

I got this bike after having to sell my FZR 1000 when I lost my job, yet I still enjoy ridding the diversion round town after downgrading, BUT! I hate it on dual carriageways and motorways, it just doesn't have the pull needed and is wobbly as he'll. The engines deliver very little power considering you can pick up a 600cc with nearly double the power for the same price but they are truly bulletproof. The suspension is the worst I have ever experienced but that was easily sorted by swapping them with some advice from www.xjrider.com

Ride quality & brakes 2 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 3 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
4 out of 5 Divvy Dependability
01 December 2012 by lewp

I had a Divvy for about a year and covered around 6k miles. This bike is a great commuter, reliable, robustly built, and has a good level of weather protection. It is, as others have said, a little boring, but boring can be good sometimes. The only trouble I had with the bike was when I left the park lights on by mistake and even then I could bump start it without problem. It is worth noting that it you turn the ignition key past the steering lock that it leaves the back parking light on :-)

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
3 out of 5 Does its job
15 October 2012 by megger

I have owned many many bikes, and when choosing a bike, you have to ask "what do i want it for". This i brought for a runaround, i wanted something around the 600cc mark, good for going to work on and somthing the the theiving scum wont want to nic (thats why i did not go for a crosser) I have done the whole sports bike, and just cant trust myself, so there a no go. So the XJ came up, good value for money, as said, its a no thrills bike, but it does what it was designed for and it does it well. room enough for two, it goes and stops and not much else. Saying that i am not disapointed with it, as i knew what i was buying.

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 2 out of 5
3 out of 5 XJ 600 S Divvy
21 March 2012 by JustChillOut

Astra diesel sums it up well! It's a great budget bike for the daily commute - I struggle to get less than 50 mpg normally 55+. Riding position is good, handling in traffic is nice and light. I've spent 18 months and 12k miles through 2 winters on mine and it's hardly missed a beat. Riding out 'for fun' I'd like a little more excitement but that isn't really why I bought it so can't complain. Vibration and other niggles are minor and I don't really notice now.

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 3 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
3 out of 5 xj 600n
30 September 2011 by gstring75

my first bike is an xj 600n tbh not much different from the 125 i did cbt on!

Ride quality & brakes 2 out of 5
Engine 2 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 1 out of 5
Value vs rivals 2 out of 5
Equipment 1 out of 5
4 out of 5 XJ 600 S in Germany
04 October 2010 by SteBev

Im very surprised with my XJ600 now thats saying something because my last bike was a GSXR750 and yes i was a bloody maniac on it. I like the riding position and the smooth motor above 50 mph but the Exhausts are cack to say the least, that will be 444 quid for a new 4-2 (dont like the 4-1) i just hope her indoors dont ask me the real price ! its not to stable but i still throw it around the back roads and see off some of the racer boy wanna be's just hope the tyres will last, only time will tell !

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 2 out of 5
4 out of 5 xj600n what a cracker
01 June 2010 by iford

Being a 55 year old my views may be strange? i am athe peverbial bore again rider (last 7 years) since I have had 2 customs 3 classics 2 trailies and 3 all rounders. The xj600n?diversion gets some slagging as boring and bland etc. I have to say I aggree a lot with "skellyjelly". As a general use Motorcycle the little divvy is a cracker. It is a simple no nonsence bike designed for basic all round riding and it does its job perfectly. It is so light and easy to ride and reasonably comfey, quick too when required. Each time it seems when I pull up at the lights next to R1's etc stretch and groan and in these days of speed traps and of course idiot car drivers keeping your speed down a bit ain't a bad idea!! Fuel useage is low 60 to 65 mpg top speed ton+ (if you can hang on)insurance low. If you tinker with home maintaince an ablsolute doddle

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
4 out of 5 xj600n what a cracker
01 June 2010 by iford

Being a 55 year old my views may be strange? i am athe peverbial bore again rider (last 7 years) since I have had 2 customs 3 classics 2 trailies and 3 all rounders. The xj600n?diversion gets some slagging as boring and bland etc. I have to say I aggree a lot with "skellyjelly". As a general use Motorcycle the little divvy is a cracker. It is a simple no nonsence bike designed for basic all round riding and it does its job perfectly. It is so light and easy to ride and reasonably comfey, quick too when required. Each time it seems when I pull up at the lights next to R1's etc stretch and groan and in these days of speed traps and of course idiot car drivers keeping your speed down a bit ain't a bad idea!! Fuel useage is low 60 to 65 mpg top speed ton+ (if you can hang on)insurance low. If you tinker with home maintaince an ablsolute doddle

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
3 out of 5 Noobz
20 February 2010 by skellyjelly

Who are these non-owning noobs who write this shite for MCN? If I don’t want to ride at 200mph, have the latest environment-robbing alloy frame and hit 62mph in less than 2 seconds, whilst still pulling a wheelie for the front cover for those so-called bikers, where should I turn. I’ll tell you where, the owners opinions. These are the guys who parted with their hard-earned and who use it like you bought it. Check Warren Pole doing his best as a TV presenter on some obscure TV channel to see how they view motorcycle journalism. We’re just a step up for the ambitious. Be who you are, and ignore the power rangers. They’re part-timers, at the best.

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 3 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 2 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
5 out of 5 great for first big bike
16 January 2010 by edboo

I bought a 1997 divvy in October as my first big bike good in all weather it hasn't let me down.I recommend it for fist big bike but cont compare it to anything else as its my first big bike.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 So easy
23 November 2009 by Meaty79

To ride. This is my first big bike and I'm not a experienced rider as I passed my CBT in May and my DAS in late July. Since then I have been riding a 25 year old KH125 which is about half the weight and a fraction of the power so was a bit concerned about riding the Divi the 80 miles home from Cambridge but was pleasently surprised to find it is one of the easiest bikes to ride that I have riden (and I am talking about the big bikes the riding school uses). Mine seems to pull top gear well from about 45 and just felt right from the off. Very comfy on the hour and a half trip home and handles better than I can. Highly recommended as a first big bike or comfy tourer with a bit of grunt.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
3 out of 5 A bit gut less
05 August 2008 by Mjollnir

but a good first bike. You have to rev the tits off it to get anywhere quickly though. The suspension is a bit soggy. The long wheel base both makes the bike stable, and not quite as nimble in the corners. As a first bike I think this is a great buy, and wouldn't let you down. It would would also be good for city commuting.

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 3 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 2 out of 5
4 out of 5 Dream Divi
04 October 2007 by Parajoe

Bought mine last month, nine years old in great condition(from local Yamaha dealer),. It does exacly what I bought it for, every day use around town with occasional trips out, very flexible (low geared), does around 50mpg, cruises at 80+, comfortable for two, small screen remarkably effective. Just about cured the vibration at 4000rpm(or the symptoms of...)still have the clutch tick, ticking noise spoken about above, but I really find it very comfortable & flexible - but not a 'scratcher'in handling or performance. But I did'nt buy it for that!

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
3 out of 5 Gutless, but great beginners bike
13 April 2007 by KWAK6ftRider

the bike is very easy to ride, but lacks power, even above 6000 revs. the suspension is soft. It is good for beginners and won't steer them wrong, but they will quickly be wanting more out of a bike.

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 2 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
4 out of 5 Great budget or beginner bike
08 September 2006 by Angelus1981

I bought mine after passing DAS. I`ve never felt intimidated. Bought it cheap and spent virtually nothing running it. If you want a cheap run around that you can sit comfortably on all day then this bike is perfect. Strengths: Cheap to buy, cheap to insure, cheap to run, comfortable soft suspension. WIll cruise at 80 all day. Weaknesses: Not the prettiest of bikes. Lacks some power for experienced riders. Exhaust is prone to rust and wheel bearings are known to fail.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 2 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 A revelation
19 July 2006 by hondapartsman

After 20+ years riding a CB250RS and convincing myself I didn't need anything bigger, realising I'm getting older and after five and half years off two wheel or anything much with a chronic illness I decided that maybe something bigger would be nice, I decided I needed something that would cost me no more on the insurance, be cheap to run but give me adequate power and after reading about it had to be a CB500, a Bandit or one of these. In the end this one came up a the right price so had to be it, 30,000 on the clock, new tyres, chain and sprocks and a nice new MOT it couldn't be bettered although my boss was a little taken aback that I'd got a Yamaha instead of Honda. Great bike though, pulls like a train, more than enough power for the riding I do where I consider 80mph to be plenty fast enough, I love riding it, mind of the boss man offered to swop me a new CBF500 for it I'd be tempted. Strengths: Adequate power, good fuel consumption (60mpg plus) comfortable for me (6'4") and carries me and my nine year old with ease, easy servicing, just a good solid workhorse with the oomph to get me past the Sunday drivers. Weaknesses: Isn't a Honda and getting spares takes too long ( 2 weeks for a genuine speedo cable, got pattern in the end). Choke seems to do nothing but starts okay anyway and annoying vibration at 50mph but the at least the encourages me to crack on just a little faster.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 1999 XJ 600 naked 12,000 miles
19 June 2006 by gochef

I have looked everywhere and weeks for my first bike. Like many others, I looked for a Bandit to start and even test drived a few. But something was not right with the Bandit,..no Love I guess. I am 6ft2 and rugby player, so I needed a bike who was going to be just the right size, economical, solid and easy to look after. The XJ 600 had more all of the right attributes and much more! The seat and suspensions are comfortable, the handling is newbie friendly, the service is cheap and the parts very easy to find. the twin exhaust give that extra monster look. Please remember one thing, this is not a superbike! There is no electronic and pretty fairing. Just a good basic (solid) bike ideal for everyday commuting.. ask yourself the question? Do you really need to reach 160mph? Strengths: Good on fuel, enough power, easy to look after, solid engine good value for money. Weaknesses: Not commum as Bandit ... therefore harder to customize.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 3 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 A great novice work horse
20 May 2006 by rustyyamaha

This is my 1st bike and from talking to people in the trade, friends and family, this type of bike seemed to fit the bill of what I wanted. I had only riden a bike 5 times (and that was doing my cbt and test) before riding it, and what a joy it was. For a complete novice it is a very user friendly bike. Also it is a very nippy bike that is able to get you out of trouble if required. Strengths: Usability for novices, and it lightness make it a great starter bike. The nippiness of the thing as well, make it a good starter bike. Weaknesses: Because it was only riden once in a year, I am finding if it is not ridden for a couple of days it can be very sluggish for a few miles, but thats just this bike. Apart from that I have not had it long enough to find a weakness.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 A great all rounder and a cheap way on to a reliable quick full size bike
20 October 2005 by kintheuk

I bought a 600N (the one with out the fairing) in 2004 as a way back to two wheels after 1 long time on four wheels. I have found the bike to be reliable, quick enough for getting used to two wheels again and plus a reasonable handling bike. The prices for these bikes are ridiculously low when you compare them to any of its logical competitors, it may not have the custome parts catalogue of the Bandit nor the assumed reliability of the CB500s but it does not suffer in most minds for this. Strengths: Reliable, robust, easy to work on (and I only just about know which end of a socket is which). Weaknesses: Image is its only weakness and possibly its low prices which work to make buyers happy but seems to be the yard stick by which many measure it. A same year bandit would probably cost near enough twice what I paid and I doubt would be any happier.

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 3 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
3 out of 5 Supercommuter / hack
20 October 2005 by gurninman

Bought the bike to commute on - sick of late, astinking trains. Did everything asked of it, and provided a fair bit of fun. Easy to ride, easy to service, cheap to run, comfy. Discovered this : http://groups.msn.com/yamahadiversions - the friendliest, most informative bike group on the net. Strengths: Cheap, comfy, cheap, easy to service, cheap, unintimidating for new riders, cheap. Weaknesses: Cheap a bit slow.

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 3 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 2 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 Inherited bike from friend emmigrating to Aus'
18 March 2005 by Frampy

This bike does it all. Commutes in sun rain and snow. I have managed to keep up with Suziki Bandits down lanes and on A roads. As long as you remeber its got basic suspension its fine. Strengths: Reliable, cheap to service and maintain. Will sit at 80 all day and return 40 - 45 MPG. Weaknesses: No fuel warning light! Soft suspension. Yamaha paint comes off of the wheels.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 3 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
3 out of 5 My Review
17 July 2003 by sheepie

If you've got a limited Budget and do sky high milage, this could be the bike for you, If you can put up with the lack of speed that is. In 50k only one break down and that was due to a corroded connector. Not sure why people moan about the finish. Wash mine once a week and still looks ok. Crashes well to boot. Chucked it down the road at 20mph, still rideable afterways. Could do with another 20bhp and shaft drive but you can't have everything. Hold on a minute maybe you can xj900 here we come :)

Ride quality & brakes 2 out of 5
Engine 2 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 2 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 My Review
17 June 2003 by bonser

Cheap, reliable transport. Used it to do 90 mile a day motorway commute. Generally reliable- rear fuel pump, shocks and wheel bearings replaced under warranty. Electrics are placed in a vulnerable position under the seat so the starter switch wire corrodes over time.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 2 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
3 out of 5 My Review
06 November 2001 by Stefanbear

Dislikes - Rear brake collects dust and squeaks no matter how much it's cleaned. Mirrors not much use at high speed due to vibration. Likes - perfect bike to learn real riding on after doing my Direct Access. Nice sounding engine. Very reliable.

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 3 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 2 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
3 out of 5 My Review
25 September 2001 by dpabbott

The buzz at 4000-4500rpm makes the mirrors vibrate badly enough to make them useless - pity that 4000-4500 rpm equates to motorway cruising speed...

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 3 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
07 July 2001 by steve hyland

An excellent bike for riding to work everyday whatever the weather. Handles adverse weather very well, has so far felt very capable of handling most situations remaining stable throughout . Extremely comfortable to ride for hours, although on out of town journey's the wind buffeting can get a bit tiring. However if I lie on the tank I have got 116 out of it.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
Back to top