KAWASAKI W800 (2011 - on) Review

At a glance

Owners' reliability rating: 4.7 out of 5 (4.7/5)
Annual servicing cost: £140
Power: 47 bhp
Seat height: Medium (31.1 in / 790 mm)
Weight: Medium (476 lbs / 216 kg)

Prices

New £6,799
Used £4,000 - £6,000

Overall rating

Next up: Ride & brakes
5 out of 5 (5/5)

Our first test of Kawasaki’s new W800 suggests that Britain’s own Triumph, after for five years having things all its own way in the ‘retro roadster’ class, has a new, real rival on its hands. Not only is the Kawasaki W800 cheaper and better specced than its closest Bonneville rival, the Kawasaki’s uprated engine means there’s now no discernible performance difference either.

Ride quality & brakes

Next up: Engine
4 out of 5 (4/5)

The Kawasaki W800’s handling compliments that perfectly. Its old school, upright riding position, cute, slim proportions and wide-ish bars blend seamlessly with the responsive but soft delivery to make the W800 ridiculously easy to just get on and ride.

Only when you start to push silly-hard does the single front disc start to seem inadequate (but the rear drum is sensitive and useful), the forks seem boingingly oversoft, the big 19-inch front wheel and chunky, deep-treaded, period-style Dunlop tyre seem to under-steer and scrabble a little for grip. The rest of the time it’s fine.

Engine

Next up: Reliability
4 out of 5 (4/5)

The two biggest updates to the Kawasaki W800 are the growth in capacity and switch to fuel injection. The Kawasaki W800’s five-mill overbore takes it up from 676cc to 773cc, and is thrummingly pleasant: brisk enough for this kind of bike and happy to cruise along at 80-90.

Think ‘middling car performance’ but with a bit of extra pep away from the lights and you won’t be far wrong. The Kawasaki W800’s new fuel-injection helps in this and is faultless: crisp, instant throttle response with nary a glitch or hiccup anywhere in its revs. There’s not much point wringing its neck, mind, as things start to tail off and get a bit breathless above 5000rpm or so.

The only other slight criticisms are that, if anything, it’s a little bit TOO civilised: a touch too soft, smooth and quiet. It really is crying out for a set of rortier pipes with which to bounce decibels off some village cottages. Overall, though, the new W800’s performance is not just adequate, it’s amazingly user-friendly both for retro fans and novices alike. 

Reliability & build quality

Next up: Value
4 out of 5 (4/5)

The Kawasaki W800 doesn’t just have the authentic specification, it’s beautifully and classily done, too: the two-tone paint is deep, the chrome good, the alloy finishes beautiful. It’s too early to pronounce on reliability yet, but on the strength of how it’s built and put together the W800 is a pretty classy act.

Value vs rivals

Next up: Equipment
4 out of 5 (4/5)

On face value the new Kawasaki W800, seems pricey compared to the base Triumph Bonneville. But that’s not comparing like with like. In truth, the closest rival to the W800, with its wire wheels, twin dials, two-tone paint, fork gaiters and so on, is the Bonneville T100 which is actually £100 MORE and still not as well specced. On that basis, the Kawasaki W800 is decent value. Triumph should be worried.

Equipment

5 out of 5 (5/5)

The old W650 was generally considered an authentic and classily-detailed ‘reproduction’ thanks to its great-looking engine, alloy-rimmed wire wheels, proper chrome mudguards, retro-style twin dials, kickstart, knee pads etc. But the new Kawasaki W800 takes things up another level. There’s a new, more ‘ribbed’ seat and lower handlebars.

The engine’s cylinders, rear hub/drum and fork sliders are now alloy finished instead of black and there are new, improved mirrors, exhaust heat shields, a different tank badge and more. It all adds up to a gorgeously – yes really – complete and authentic machine which is simply leagues above, say, Triumph’s Bonneville.

Specs

Engine size 773cc
Engine type 4v air-cooled parallel twin, six gears
Frame type Tubular steel double cradle
Fuel capacity 14 litres
Seat height 790mm
Bike weight 216kg
Front suspension 39mm telescopic forks, no adjust
Rear suspension Twin shocks, preload adjust
Front brake 300mm disc, twin piston caliper
Rear brake 160mm drum
Front tyre size 100/90 x 19
Rear tyre size 130/80 x 18

Mpg, costs & insurance

Average fuel consumption 52 mpg
Annual road tax £117
Annual service cost £140
New price £6,799
Used price £4,000 - £6,000
Insurance group -
How much to insure?
Warranty term Two year unlimited mileage

Top speed & performance

Max power 47 bhp
Max torque 60 ft-lb
Top speed 110 mph
1/4 mile acceleration -
Tank range 162 miles

Model history & versions

Model history

2011: Model launched

Other versions

None

Owners' reviews for the KAWASAKI W800 (2011 - on)

21 owners have reviewed their KAWASAKI W800 (2011 - on) and rated it in a number of areas. Read what they have to say and what they like and dislike about the bike below.

Review your KAWASAKI W800 (2011 - on)

Summary of owners' reviews

Overall rating: 4.5 out of 5 (4.5/5)
Ride quality & brakes: 4.1 out of 5 (4.1/5)
Engine: 4.4 out of 5 (4.4/5)
Reliability & build quality: 4.7 out of 5 (4.7/5)
Value vs rivals: 4.7 out of 5 (4.7/5)
Equipment: 4.1 out of 5 (4.1/5)
Annual servicing cost: £140
4 out of 5 W800 Cafe, don't dismiss it!!
27 June 2023 by Brad Hollywood

Version: Cafe

Year: 2020

Annual servicing cost: £180

Would have been 5 out of 5 but finish let's it down. Lovely torque rich slow revving engine, and the burble and pops from the standard exhaust is wonderful. It doesn't handle like a sports bike, it doesn't brake like one either, but it's not supposed to be. It's so much fun on sweeping bends, bumps can unsettle it but that adds to the charm!! The bronze/brown tank is wonderful in the sunlight. Its comfyish (I have a back and hip issue, so sit up and beg positions cause me all sorts of problems), I can manage a couple of hrs without a break, it does around 60mpg and looks utterly gorgeous.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Lovely engine, even though its the cafe its super comfy and stops that lower back pain I get on a more upright bike. I can do 2 hrs without a break, can get a bit wristy in town but that soon goes.

Engine 5 out of 5

I love singles and twins, this is a wonderful torque rich engine, I had to down trade from a new GSX8S to pay for my daughters wedding, I was initially worried about the lack of power!! But the torque slow revving motor and slick gearbox deserves 5 out of 5.

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

My bike gas now covered 3,300 miles, it has rust on the frame, both side panels, and rear mudguard. Paint on the tank is top quality. Idle seems to be high at 1400 rpm. Rust on the headstock, central exhaust balancer, lower frame rails. Disappointed considering the price!!

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

Annual service, its had 3, although only done 3,300 miles.

Equipment 4 out of 5

Er Abs....fuel warning light.... led headlight.... yep, think that's about it!!

Buying experience: Orwell motorcycles the best dealers I have ever dealt with.

4 out of 5 Possibly too expensive but almost certainly underrated.
09 January 2023 by Glads

Version: W800

Year: 2020

Annual servicing cost: £250

Absolutely not for everyone. Want power? Buy a modern Bonneville. Want value? Buy a Royal Enfield Interceptor. But for those who want a classically styled roadster with top notch modern build and a dose of scarcity, it’s an easy bike to fall for. Best for looks, noise, comfort and a nebulous ‘zen’ factor that keeps its rider chilled out. No good for those whose idea of a great journey is to travel so quickly that they almost arrive before they set off. Also a very good bike for a rider that doesn’t mind engaging regularly in conversations with strangers, because the classic W800 seems to attract plenty of attention from both bikers and non-bikers.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Brakes are fine once bedded in, with good feel but a little less power at the front disc than on many modern nakeds. Handling is predictable at the front (I think the front forks work better than on pre-2019 W800’s). Rear shocks are good for comfort but feel ripe for an upgrade to get a little more control on less than perfectly surfaced A-roads. And the seat is perfectly padded for an 80kg backside. Take any criticisms of the standard fit K300 Dunlops with a large pinch of salt. They may be a poor fit for US highways with rain grooves but for UK surfaces they’re fine at various temperatures and in both wet and dry.

Engine 4 out of 5

Visually and aurally, it’s a thing of beauty. Power is… enough. Wholly unacceptable for trackdays. Entirely sufficient for a solo ride in the real world, though. And what a glorious, chilled out but still aurally delightful noise through the standard exhausts. There’s plenty of online criticism of this engine regarding vibes. First thing to note is that they partially dissipate once the running in service is done. Second is that riders will still notice them through pegs, seat and bars around the 3,500 to 4,500 mark. Third is that they’re polarising. Some will hate the sensation. Others will find it entirely tolerable and characterful. For me, I used to find the 5,000 rpm numbing tingle from an inline four XJR1300 difficult to live with, whereas I did a 700 mile Essex - Wales - South coast trip on the W800 and could have happily done the same trip twice over. It’s no warp drive but it can move the bike surprisingly quickly whilst being uncannily great at keeping its rider in a state of zen. I absolutely adore this motor but the 4 stars reflect that it won’t be for everyone.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Great welds and frame finish. Nil corrosion on wheels after 1 year. Lustrous paint. Minuscule appetite for oil. Two minor recalls fixed under warranty (horn wiring and exhaust nuts) but neither developed into a fault on my bike. The chrome on the 2020 model is very good quality and it’s the only the second bike I’ve owned in the last decade that has clocks that never mist up. And that engine is a work of art that has, to date, been faultless.

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

The purchase price looks high, especially if the dealer has a Royal Enfield Interceptor in stock. Until a side by side inspection reveals where the costs were cut on the RE (which I am also a fan of). Running costs aren’t bad, with the 47hp motor keeping insurance costs down. Fuel economy is an easy 55mpg in town and outskirts, with 65 mpg achievable at steady A road and motorway speeds. No fuel gauge, just a fuel warning light that tends to come on with just over 1 full UK gallon left in the tank.

Equipment 3 out of 5

ABS and … a rev counter. Not much else. But what there is is high quality. And that LED headlight is really damn good. Reasonably good availability of aftermarket accessories, with SW Motech SLC panniers and a Dart fly screen being a good way to add a little extra touring ability without spoiling the looks.

Buying experience: Purchased new from a good dealer, having seen the bike in the showroom for months with no interest. Got 24 months interest free and have been well looked after.

5 out of 5 A modern shard of the true motorcycling cross
04 August 2021 by PureBob

Year: 2011

Annual servicing cost: £220

Full markes for perfectly realisig its design brief - that is, "recreate a 1966 Triumph Bonneville in every way but make it bulletproof, everywhere". Slating areas of ownership of the W800 are exactly like slating a 1966 T120. To experience a shard from the true cross of motorcycling the W scores 10/10. As a daily rider in 2021, the W scores like a Bonnie would. If you love an MT10, you will likely hate this. That's okay, its not meant for you.

Ride quality & brakes 2 out of 5

Cruising sweeping, smooth tarmac ribbons as roads between 50-65, the W800 feels perfect. The rider is aware of every force of physics at play. Beguiling. Broken surfaces and undulations immediately catch out the very crude suspension which crashes and reverberates over the smallest imperfection. Yep, just like a 1966 Bonnie. I am considering a suspension upgrade, but putting a grand on a bike worth three doesnt seem to make sense. The W is not a comfortable motorway cruiser. The engine easily pulls at 70-80 but only a masochist enjoyes that, with the upright seating position making a spinnaker of the rider, and the crude suspension making for wobbles and floats. Best stick it at 65 on the M5 and set out a bit earlier.The front disc is poor. Better than the Bonnie's but barely. Even for a middle speed cruiser, the front brake is inadequate. The rear drum is fine, handy in stabilising the W around roundabouts and low speed manoevres. Seat is beautiful but uncomfortable. Most riders plop a gel pad under their taint to try to make an hour between cowboy breaks.

Engine 5 out of 5

As a paean to the Bonnie twin, the engine is perfect. Its looks really beautiful with the exposed bevel drive tube, and is torquey everywhere. It makes no power, really, so expect performance around that of an eighties 400 Superdream (or a 66 bonnie) and you won't be disappointed.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Massively overbuilt everywhere. Castings, welds, control housings, clocks, everything looks and feels perfectly built. All that metal and quality sure adds weight, but the quality is inarguable. A pal just put his 89 thousandth mile on his heavily toured W800. Just regular maintenance.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

The easiest bike to service I know of, excepting battery access. Any half capable spanner dude can service a W him/herself. Less than an hours labour for a pro shop to service.

Equipment 3 out of 5

Usable helmet lock, beautiful classic instruments, but with tastefully comprehensive lights. Single key access to ignition and fuel tank. Nothing to write home about.

Buying experience: Privately from an awesome octagenarian who had it from new, and was giving up biking only under sufferance from his family. Rode it almost daily, and maintained it perfectly. I paid £3500 advertised price including a topbox, weather and dry covers in 2019. I've added 4k miles since then.

4 out of 5
24 February 2021 by Demon

Year: 2016

Annual servicing cost: £35

I love the looks of the bike apart from the hideous rear light and the n/s injector cover which is totally different from the o/s one! The original seat was torture after a couple of hours riding and the exhaust is way too quiet. Fuel injection can be choppy at low speeds and the suspension and brakes are not up to scratch for a modern bike, having said this it is a very easy bike to ride with loads of character. The W800 is a bike that can be personalized to no end and I've made quite a few changes to mine to make it perfect for me, these include a better suspension, higher bars, fuel controller, Corbin seat, Motad exhaust and Thruxton rear light to name just a few. It's been totally reliable and apart from the front forks crazing under the lacquer it still looks like new.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Poor brakes and soft suspension. Seat is terrible after a couple of hours riding.

Engine 3 out of 5

Needs more power straight from the box

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5

TT100 tyres look great but don't last long.

4 out of 5 Great classic bike without the reliability issues!
15 May 2020 by Smalls82

Year: 2013

Best proper retro out there especially as a base to modify.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

If you ride it how it’s designed it’s fine, but it ain’t great if you try and ride it like a more modern higher costing bike if that’s what your used to.

Engine 4 out of 5

Nice and friendly but not much go, and sounds wet unless the exhausts are changed!

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

Reliability great, finish on parts is not best.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5

Nothing really there, but that’s the best bit.

5 out of 5 Best bike I’ve ever owned - and I’ve had a few
16 September 2018 by RoopKem

Version: Special edition

Year: 2016

I keep looking but I can’t find anything better. I love this bike to death. It’s a great ride and reminds me constantly of my 1974 Bonny. The only downsides for me are: it’s just a little too small. It’s slightly underpowered, especially two up and it wobbles at speeds. The power issue is a simple fix, I’ve bought a tune up chip from the states which gives it 15 per cent more power combined with better fuel consumption. We shall see if it ever arrives. Lastly, it wobbles at speed. Doesn’t matter if the shocks are on position 2 or 200 - it wobbles. I’ll be changing the shocks imminently. I recently test rode some Harley’s, triumphs and a norton. My little W800 just beats them hands down in quality and smoothness - especially the thruxton r which I found disturbingly clunky - especially the gearbox

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Bike is best around town. Highly manouverable. Good on a long journey but seat gets a little uncomfortable

Engine 3 out of 5

Just don’t understand why a 800cc modern fuel injected bike dribbles out less HP than a 60 year old BSA

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

No issues as yet. I’ve just notched up 5000 miles since owning it. It’s great

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5

Bike is beautifully equipped

Buying experience: I bought the bike from a dealer in Birmingham last year. They were highly professional

5 out of 5 Best bike I’ve ever owned - and I’ve had a few
16 September 2018 by RoopKem

Version: Special edition

Year: 2016

I keep looking but I can’t find anything better. I love this bike to death. It’s a great ride and reminds me constantly of my 1974 Bonny. The only downsides for me are: it’s just a little too small. It’s slightly underpowered, especially two up and it wobbles at speeds. The power issue is a simple fix, I’ve bought a tune up chip from the states which gives it 15 per cent more power combined with better fuel consumption. We shall see if it ever arrives. Lastly, it wobbles at speed. Doesn’t matter if the shocks are on position 2 or 200 - it wobbles. I’ll be changing the shocks imminently. I recently test rode some Harley’s, triumphs and a norton. My little W800 just beats them hands down in quality and smoothness - especially the thruxton r which I found disturbingly clunky - especially the gearbox

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Bike is best around town. Highly manouverable. Good on a long journey but seat gets a little uncomfortable

Engine 3 out of 5

Just don’t understand why a 800cc modern fuel injected bike dribbles out less HP than a 60 year old BSA

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

No issues as yet. I’ve just notched up 5000 miles since owning it. It’s great

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5

Bike is beautifully equipped

Buying experience: I bought the bike from a dealer in Birmingham last year. They were highly professional

5 out of 5 A revelation - recommend a test ride...
16 January 2017 by Grahame Harwood

Version: AGF

Year: 2011

Annual servicing cost: £50

The bike is very comfortable to ride (way better than the W650) and a virtually maintenance free bike. A well balanced bike with a very secure easy riding experience. Excellent value for money. Fantastic manufacturer support as regards any technical issues/updates/recalls. Exhaust note is very quiet which results in a very sophisticated motorcycle. More exhaust volume and a bit more mid range power is easily tapped into by removing the rubber air filter snorkel and even more so by removing exhaust baffles. Apparently the ECU is self learning and can be reset by disconnecting and reconnecting the battery. Warm idle speed and cold idle speed are also easily adjustable via two screws. I have removed baffles and snorkel and my bike sounds like an old 70's Bonneville and goes like one too (I am old enough to compare), virtually the same bore and stroke so shouldn't be a surprise really.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Bike is a cruiser and not set up for high speed performance above 100mph although it is well capable. Best settings for rear springs is number 2 (next to softest). If you set these harder you will get a speed wobble at 80-85mph. I can ride the bike for 2 hours easily without break, no cramps at all.

Engine 5 out of 5

Power delivery is very sophisticated and evenly distributed. You can ride around in 5th gear and there is loads of torque. Only need to change down if you are going really slow. Takes a bit of getting used to to realise that you don't need to keep going up and down the gearbox (loads of torque from 1,000 revs with baffles out). The bike is just so easy going and an absolute joy to ride.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

There are manufacturer recalls for new fuel pump and throttle body holders as some bikes have had issues. My fuel pump was failing but throttle bodies were fine (fuel pump had a high pitched whine which was worst on start up and bike did once lose power and stopped prior to fuel pump replacement at manufacturers cost/recall). Also a recall to check/replace wiring harness and fit plastic protective cover.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Only requires oil and filter change which you can do youself. I use fully synthetic oil which is more expensive.

Equipment 5 out of 5

You have all you need for a retro bike. Digital clock is a nice touch together with low fuel warning messenger. Great to have rev counter and speedo.

Buying experience: Paid 4,000 pounds from a dealer for bike with 13,000 miles. Paid the advertised price of 4,000 pounds.

4 out of 5 Lovely looking but lots of vibrations.
24 May 2016 by Ian Ginn

Version: W800 SE

Year: 2016

Lovely looking but lots of vibration. Took this beautiful looking bike out for a test ride today. I'm 6ft 3"....... It's a bit small for me. After an hour and 25 miles on B roads, A roads and 15minutes on a motorway I knew it wasn't for me. I have read about vibrations on the bike......Jesus it was like riding a pneumatic drill. I couldn't believe the vibrations through the pegs, handle bars etc. Getting back on my f800 gs was like sinking in to a sofa. Stunning looking motorcycle for the smaller rider who can live with lots of vibration.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 Mr back in time relaxed cruiser
04 April 2016 by dave alanson

Year: 2014

Can be skittish if pushed hard but this bike is more about relaxing cruising

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5

Gear the expectations and you waon't be dissapointed remember this bike is about relaxed, 60 mph crusing not a full on performance machine and you'll be very happy.

Engine 5 out of 5

Looks fantastic especially with the lovely bevel drive

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Kawasaki as you'd expect is 100% reliable

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

can use oil but not massive amounts

Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 Great back to the basics bike
05 February 2016 by Anon

Year: 2011

I've had two of these, both the green and chrome originals. The first I bought new (early 2011 build) and put around 40,000km on it, and while I still had that one I bought a second (late 2012 build) with 1500km on it from an old fellow who decided it was too heavy for him. I've run old Brit bikes for years and the W800 feels and rides pretty much like a more sophisticated, slightly heavier and more substantial version of a 60's 650 or 750 twin. Been riding for nearly 50 years, many years of touring, owned a lot of big bikes and don't drive a car; the W800 is a great bike.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

The suspension is pretty basic, about the same as my 2 BSAs in fact, although the W800 front end is better than the Beeza's. The seat is OK for a couple of hours, but it is a bit soft and while it is comfy for the passenger, the bike is physically quite small and the seat a tad short for any long distance pillioning. Bumpy roads - lots of them here - start to knock the stuffing out of you after a couple of hours as well. The bike tours well and will happily sit on the freeway at 120kmh with enough in reserve for passing if needed, or it can be used to plod around at 75kmh in top in country lanes. Brakes are fine for the bike - the single front disk works well but does feel a tad spongy, rear drum works exceptionally well.

Engine 4 out of 5

A lot of torque down low - max is at 2300rpm and it is flat from there to redline and around 45ft/lbs from memory, but at 48hp and 215kg wet it really could do with a few more just to give a bit of an edge at times. There are some vibes up to around 3500rpm, but from there to redline it is very smooth. A genuine 110kmh (local highway limit) is just on 4000rpm and it is right in the powerband and vibe free. The engine is mechanically quiet and the cam gear drive can just be heard. Gearbox is fine with decent ratios, although my first one would jump out of 5th gear unless it was firmly selected. The engines take about 10,000km before they are fully freed up and performing at their best. I know of one with well over 100,000km on it, and it has been problem free.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Sole fault on the first was a blown indicator bulb around 30,000km. When I sold that one the original chain and sprockets were still in perfect nick, brakes original and still around 60% and the valves had never needed shimming. I've only put around 8000km on the second and no problems are expected. Build quality and paintwork is very good, apart from the headlight shell everything is steel, not plastic, Allen bolts are used throughout, wiring is well laid out and of very good quality. The bike has a very solid feel to it. Nice gauges and a reasonable headlight.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

I do my own servicing, change the oil and filter every 5000km, checked the valves at 18,000 and 32,000km, no adjustment needed, air filters are washable foam, brakes last well and there's nothing else to really do with them. The first averaged around 68mpg Imperial and the second is slightly better, averaging about 72mpg. I've hit 76mpg on one tank at a constant 80kmh. I do take the bike on longer runs quite often, but most of my mileage has been a daily run to work of around 70km in the countryside at 80-100kmh. The fuel economy drops to the low 60's in stop-start urban traffic.

Equipment 4 out of 5

Centre stand, toolkit, a couple of occy strap tie down points, external helmet lock, and adjustable clutch and brake levers are standard. No headlight flash button, power outlets or other wizardry. The best tyres I've found for it (and I've tried a lot as our chipseal roads wear most of them out in 5000km) are the Metzler ME880 on the front and a Michelin Pilot Activ on the rear. Handle better and last longer than any others I've tried. I fitted Hepco and Becker racks and luggage, Eastern Beaver fuse box, Oxford grips, twin 35W LED spotlights and a removable Givi touring screen for bad weather. The alternator can handle the spots and grips without any problems.

5 out of 5 Mr Retrounaut Back To The Future
27 June 2015 by Dave Alan

Year: 2014

Annual servicing cost: £100

A usable and attractive motorcycle that delivers on all fronts. It takes on the Bonneville head to head and is a definite equal. It is a smaller frame and lighter too. In terms of looks it is arguably a much better looking ''British'' bike and it has faithfully incorporated much of the the old British bike ethos. If you like modern classic this is definitely one to consider seriously.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Is skittish at times, but this is the nature of the bike and it's tyres.

Engine 5 out of 5

Well made and smooth and no intrusive vibrations. This is retro with all the painful bits removed. Great for longer distances as well as a sunny Sunday afternoon ride out.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Attention to details is superb. The chrome is real and the finish excellent.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Too early to be specific at this point in my purchase as I've only had the bike for two weeks.

Equipment 4 out of 5

I am making sure I have a Scottoiler fitted soon to preserve chain life and the Renntec rack looks part of the bike with a good chrome finish. Custom injector covers make sure that the bike looks smoother at the injector area as the standard finish lets the bike down.

5 out of 5 Suspension
21 May 2015 by Rooster

Version: classic

Year: 2012

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

I pretty much have to agree with the review. What I will say is that I do agree with the front end being a bit soft. To rectify this, I put set of Ricor Intiminators into the forks, it toughened up the suspension and gave the bike much better handling into the corners.

Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
5 out of 5 Great Bike
15 November 2014 by Preadator

I have owned the W800 special Edition (Black with Gold wheels) for 2 years now and simply love it. Great bike for everyday use and days out with a pillion, has a great engine which just purrs along but is let down slightly by a weak front brake, and very soft front end but to be honest it just adds to the character which is why I haven't changed a thing. You really cant ride one of these bikes anywhere without grabbing attention, the amount of car drivers that sit at the lights and open their windows to tell me what a great looking 'proper' bike I have is amazing and just about everywhere you park up you will have people straight over to take a good look. For less than 6000 brand new OTR a bargain as well.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 Ace Looks
29 October 2013 by Kawasakifreak1

The W800's the best-looking retro on the market. Just a pity I'm 6 inches too tall to ride one so ignore the ownership scores.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
4 out of 5 Great Commuter and Project Bike
06 November 2012 by MojoJojo

Have come full circle from pocket rockets to KTM singles to Beemers to the W800. Bought this for the daily commute and it is perfect for that. Easy to ride, not fast but enough power and torque to cut through traffic, and arrive in style. Great bike to use as base for the ultimate cafe racer, i added Norman Hyde bars, rear set, changed winkers, fenders. Cons: some small quality issues (rust areas, FI light issues), crap exhaust, aftermarket parts fairly rare, gets wobbly over 70 Mph. Pros: gorgeous looks, great to personalise, engine with personality, cheap to run

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 Love at first gear.
01 May 2012 by

I fell in love with this bike in the few seconds it took to get up to 60mph after I opened up the throttle on a brief test ride. This was going to be my first big bike so it had to be just right. Took the Bonnie out also because I always fancied one and well, it's a Bonnie! But the Kwak just grabbed me immediately. Although the Bonneville engine was perky enough, the ride was fidgety, not the comfiest and after 20 mins I was glad it was over. The W800's twin is much smoother yet still impressively torquey & responsive. Ride position was better and as has been said by MCN and Bike, etc., the fit & finish is way ahead of the Triumph. Wasn't sure about having to clean all that chrome and lustrous paint mind, but actually it's a real pleasure because you will fall in love with the damned thing. It's so obviously been made with a rare touch that is largely missing from the sea of plastic that dominates bike showrooms these days. And to quote my SV650 owning mate- "Whoa....It looks SO much better in the flesh!". Of course only one manufacturer dominates the retro class which means much more people will be drawn, Harley-like to the heavyweight 'brand' that is Triumph instead of Kawasaki- better known for lime green sportsbikes. Their loss I'm afraid. Everyday, I realise I made the right choice and although other bikes may enter/exit the garage in the coming years- I'll always have a corner for the W800.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 I love it!
20 May 2011 by sparquie

Having swopped a Yamaha R6 for this bike I can say I have fallen in love with it. The engine is simply lovely, it is tractable and has plenty of torque. The Yamaha was quicker, but the W800 is much more fun to ride. Around the towns and villages that I drive the engine is beautiful, you don't have to keep changing gear as it will pull really well from below 2000 rpm in second, third, whatever you happen to be in really. The suspension mops up the sleeping policemen without even a murmer. I guess the brakes are not as good as the Yam but, what the hell, I hardly ever use them except if a black cat runs in front of me. I simply love it.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 I like it
03 April 2011 by Scapegoat

Back in late 60's (yeah I'm that old)Yamaha released its version of the Triumph. Kawasaki released it homage to the BSA. The Yammie hung around for a few years in various rebirths, but eventually disappeared. The Kawasaki didn't. I have ridden the W650 (when they 1st came out) & a friends bike. I liked it a lot, sure it did not have heaps of grunt. But performance fitted the retro brief. I have test ridden the W800 & same story, but with a tad more power. The finish on these bikes is great & in Kawasaki's own words, is a homage to the original W1. Compared to a lot of modern Euro & other Japanese bikes, its pretty understated style wise. Comparing it to Triumphs (like the T100) is fair, but you have to remember that even these Triumphs are not from the original manufacturer, but from a company that bought the name & is just doing the same thing that Kawasaki is doing in their interpretation of what a "Retro" bike should look like. (Kind of like Triumph's interpretation of a Japanese sports bike, the TT600, a CBR clone). I could also mention that Triumphs are manufactured in Thailand, But lets not go there. Both manufacturers do a good job in the way the bikes are presented, put a 60's Triumph or BSA next to them & you would soon see that the reality is only a nod with a few styling cues. What Kawasaki give you is a complete bike, you don't have to fork out more money on "Extras" like center stand, tool kit, knee pads & so on & the motor is a gem. I'm buying one.

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
4 out of 5 Doesn't look as good in the flesh
19 March 2011 by burningbush

After getting myself in quite a frenzy over the W800 I rushed (in the snow) to the Scottish Bike show last Saturday, eager to see the beastie in the flesh. Well I have to say I was disappointed! My heart literally sank. Ok its a nice bike but there is something not quite right with it. The engine isn't as good looking as it is on paper somehow, the tank badge rather gross, the seat looks like a blow up lilo and all in all its just trying to hard. Right.... back to the Triumph stand.... The Bonneville looks quite dull in comparison, but it just seems a tadge more 'genuine'. Shame they didn't have the Thruxton on show (why the hell not?) So what to do.... well I was out today on my Royal Enfield Bullet EFI DeLuxe and it caused more interest than any of the plastic fantastics or other chromed wonders, so no thanks Kawasaki and yeah maybe one day hello Thruxton. But until then I'm sticking with the Bullet.Cheers Chennai. (PS ignore my scores I haven't had the pleasure of riding one yet)

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
4 out of 5 Doesn't look as good in the flesh
19 March 2011 by burningbush

After getting myself in quite a frenzy over the W800 I rushed (in the snow) to the Scottish Bike show last Saturday, eager to see the beastie in the flesh. Well I have to say I was disappointed! My heart literally sank. Ok its a nice bike but there is something not quite right with it. The engine isn't as good looking as it is on paper somehow, the tank badge rather gross, the seat looks like a blow up lilo and all in all its just trying to hard. Right.... back to the Triumph stand.... The Bonneville looks quite dull in comparison, but it just seems a tadge more 'genuine'. Shame they didn't have the Thruxton on show (why the hell not?) So what to do.... well I was out today on my Royal Enfield Bullet EFI DeLuxe and it caused more interest than any of the plastic fantastics or other chromed wonders, so no thanks Kawasaki and yeah maybe one day hello Thruxton. But until then I'm sticking with the Bullet.Cheers Chennai. (PS ignore my scores I haven't had the pleasure of riding one yet)

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
Back to top