HONDA CBR500R (2014 - 2016) Review

At a glance

Owners' reliability rating: 4.4 out of 5 (4.4/5)
Annual servicing cost: £140
Power: 47 bhp
Seat height: Medium (31.1 in / 790 mm)
Weight: Medium (428 lbs / 194 kg)

Prices

New N/A
Used £3,500 - £3,900

Overall rating

Next up: Ride & brakes
4 out of 5 (4/5)

The CBR500R was designed to maximise the new 47bhp regs while at the same time being both attractive and affordable. Top speed is limited to 112mph but there’s fun to be had in getting up to speed and the CBR's handling exceeds expectations. All in all, this is an engaging, fun, and satisfying bike.

Ride quality & brakes

Next up: Engine
4 out of 5 (4/5)

Handling-wise the CBR500R exceeds expectations. Around town or at commuter speeds its typical, easy, comfortable, smooth Honda: responsive, well mannered, light and manageable, glitch-free. Up to and including brisk travelling it’s all hunky-dory and never going to catch anyone out. Instead, the slight surprise is that, when pushed pretty hard, the CBR holds its chin up as a fairly credible sports bike. 

Engine

Next up: Reliability
4 out of 5 (4/5)

There's enough pep in the CBR’s upper reaches to entertain and satisfy. There’s no real leap in power anywhere, but it does keep building and building. Low down, around town it’s grunty enough to be practical and easy and in the mid-range it’s impressively smooth (thanks to the 180-degree crank and balance shaft) and just gets on with it. And yet, above 7000rpm and up to the 8500 redline, the CB truly revels in having its neck rung.

Reliability & build quality

Next up: Value
5 out of 5 (5/5)

Although the CBR500R is clearly built to a price it's still a Honda and as such reliability shouldn't be a problem.

Value vs rivals

Next up: Equipment
4 out of 5 (4/5)

Built to a price but high-quality and fun, the CBR boasts impressive economy. Honda is claiming an average 80.2mpg which translates into a tank range of over 260 miles. This is a cheap bike but it certainly doesn’t feel like it. Under £5k for an all-new middleweight Honda is impressive.

Equipment

4 out of 5 (4/5)

The 500R isn't lacking when it comes to equipment. While the levers don’t have span adjusters and the welding on the CBR’s clip-on bars is a tad conspicuous, I struggled to criticise anything else: There are quality touches such as the silencer end cap and decent grab rails; switchgear and instruments are both good, as are the mirrors. Honda offers a wide range of accessories (including heated grips, a taller screen and hard luggage) for the bike. 

Specs

Engine size 471cc
Engine type liquid-cooled, DOHC, 8v, parallel twin, 6-speed chain drive
Frame type Tubular steel diamond, box section swingarm
Fuel capacity 15.7 litres
Seat height 790mm
Bike weight 194kg
Front suspension 41mm telescopic forks, no adjustment
Rear suspension Pro-Link monoshock with preload adhustment
Front brake 320mm wavy disc with twin-piston calipers and ABS
Rear brake 240mm wavy disc with twin-piston caliper and ABS
Front tyre size 120/70-17
Rear tyre size 160/60-17

Mpg, costs & insurance

Average fuel consumption 80 mpg
Annual road tax £84
Annual service cost £140
New price -
Used price £3,500 - £3,900
Insurance group -
How much to insure?
Warranty term -

Top speed & performance

Max power 47 bhp
Max torque 31 ft-lb
Top speed 112 mph
1/4 mile acceleration -
Tank range 260 miles

Model history & versions

Model history

  • 2014: Original parallel twin-cylinder CBR500R launched to take advantage of new 47bhp A2 licence regulations.
  • 2016: Styling, suspension and airflow tweaks, hinged fuel cap, adjustable brake lever and new exhaust can.
  • 2019: Fireblade styling including MotoGP style wings, 4% more grunt, 3kg lighter, sportier riding position, refined suspension, new slip and assist clutch, new dash, LED headlights.

Other versions

  • CB500F: Naked variant
  • CB500X: Adventure-styled sibling 

Owners' reviews for the HONDA CBR500R (2014 - 2016)

12 owners have reviewed their HONDA CBR500R (2014 - 2016) and rated it in a number of areas. Read what they have to say and what they like and dislike about the bike below.

Review your HONDA CBR500R (2014 - 2016)

Summary of owners' reviews

Overall rating: 4 out of 5 (4/5)
Ride quality & brakes: 4.2 out of 5 (4.2/5)
Engine: 4.5 out of 5 (4.5/5)
Reliability & build quality: 4.4 out of 5 (4.4/5)
Value vs rivals: 4.4 out of 5 (4.4/5)
Equipment: 3.7 out of 5 (3.7/5)
Annual servicing cost: £140
5 out of 5 Cracking little bike
19 October 2023 by PDawg94

Year: 2014

Annual servicing cost: £200

Cracking little bike the perfect road bike. Only downside is it looks a bit diddly but if you can get over that it’s absolutely cracking!

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Cracking round the bends. I’ve had two 2006 bandit 650s and an older GSXF600 before and thought it was me not having confidence meaning I’m slow round the bends but they were actually buses in comparison! Suspension good for the bumps and front brake is strong rear is adequate. More upright riding position than the bars suggest but perched seat means you can crouch down a bit behind the screen.

Engine 5 out of 5

Have to wring it but that’s all the fun. All you need for the road kept up with Ducati’s on the road no problem and keeps you in sensible speeds while delivering fun. Would be pants on track I’m sure on the straights but great for the road. Flat power delivery but in a good way - novice friendly and entertaining.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

It’s a Honda! Starts on the button no problem and only the usual consumables so far. Not bad for a 35,000 mile 6 owner machine when I got it and not showing any significant wear just the usual.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

£2,500 for a cracking road bike. Official MPG figures way off (probably due to my aprocovic!) but I still get 55-60 MPG and welcome the additional noise (not intrusive but a bit more throaty). Insurance is a lot for a 28 year old with no no claims but that’s the insurance companies who are to blame!

Equipment 5 out of 5

Fuel injection and ABS as standard small LED screen but sensible layout very legible at a glance with all the info you read and MPG read out. Just about 190 miles range excellent for £2,500.

4 out of 5 Cracking bike the money
05 September 2021 by Skelly

Year: 2014

Annual servicing cost: £130

I bought this bike as an old timer returning to two wheels, it didn't cost as much as I was expecting to have to pay and if similar bikes are in the same range regarding price/mileage/age and condition then you can't go wrong. As I am a short arris I find It handles extremely well and can be steered around twisty bits very easily and confidently and doesn't fight me, braking is a bit vague although this could be a positive for a beginner. As mentioned in other reviews the bike needs to be revved hard if you want excitement from it, as also mentioned the gearbox is not the slickest and is clunky.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

The ride quality for me is bob on, bearing in mind I am only 5' 7" and 11 stone (71kg), the seat is comfortable and I did a good 5 hours riding with a couple of quick stops for fuel and had no issues. Brakes, they're adequate, I could easily fit better pads without spending lots of money and maybe braided brake lines even but to be honest, if you use front and rear together you can get by.

Engine 5 out of 5

The engine is smooth and responsive, it likes to transit from tick over to full out revs rather than labouring at mid rev point which can be annoying if your trying to ride nicely through a little Welsh village for example but the solution seems to be to drop to second and use that until the road opens up again.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

For a 2014 bike I was both surprised and pleased with what I found on the strip down, forks in good nick, chassis all ok and free from rust, tank and fairings as new, seat etc also very good, wheels no sign of oxidisation, bearings all free and smooth, the chain and sprockets were all good as well but could have been changed recently. The one bad thing I found is that the side stand doesn't return quickly, it might be the spring but I suspect a worn bush or pin.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

The bike is not demanding in consumables, mine already had good bridgestones front and rear but having changed oil, plugs and filters for quality kit this bike looks like it will be cheap enough to keep in good condition for quite some time. MPG is amazing, over 60MPG for sure and looking like 70+.

Equipment 3 out of 5

Well you can't have everything can you. Equipment ermm I don't really class lights and indicators as equipment, their part of the bike, the lights light, front head light not too badly actually, and the indicators indicate. The clock is a nice feature but a gear indicator would have been useful, I can't be arrised to fit an aftermarket one though.

Buying experience: I seem to have been lucky, I bought it from Superbike Factory in Macclesfield and paid under two and half K for it. I did reject several of the same bike/model in their showroom for a variety of reasons, the fact that no test ride is available means you should only buy from them if you have the time to put the bike through it's paces because there is only a 30 day warranty with bikes from there unless you spend lots of money to extend the warranty.

5 out of 5 A sporty introduction to the world of perfection
10 January 2019 by Jack

Year: 2016

I have had bikes since I was 3, racing motocross for 10 years and then having a road bike for the first time at 17. I now have a GSX-R750 but nothing will compare to this bike on which I experienced my first knee down, my first ever tour and the list goes on. It's why I fell in love with motorcycles and I owe it my life, I still think about the great days we had together. It had a soul and mine hasn't recovered from selling her yet!

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

The ride quality is good in terms of it being a Jack of all trades, not too firm so as to break your spine over long distances (having done 650 miles in one day) it's the perfect small tourer. It's not so soft that you can't push on and find the limit of the bike easily in the very best way. I felt like Mick Doohan or Vale scraping pegs on every bend and maxing out the engine, the GSX-R just doesn't bring that much joy unless you're on a track.

Engine 5 out of 5

I did 35,000 miles in two years, I did all servicing myself and I'm still on the original battery. It's bulletproof, nothing can stop it apart from the 125mph barrier... that's a struggle unless you're heading downhill. It's pushy, but not nearly as fast as a 600cc bike. It makes up for it with the sheer delight of getting everything out of it.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

It's Honda, don't let the smaller engine fool you. It can go for miles and miles, I did nearly 40,000 on mine and got it written off as a CAT D and you'd never know it had done 1000. I would take it around the world with me now without even changing the oil.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5

The Honda has a good ABS system but without TC and anti-slide. It doesn't need it due to the power but it just makes you feel like you're completely in control which is why I moved on to the GSX-R. I fitted some Bridgstone S21 tyres and it transformed the ride.

2 out of 5 Worst bike I've ever owned
13 May 2018 by Jim C

Version: New shape

Year: 2016

First and last Honda i will be buying. Sub standard vehicle and worst dealership experience I've ever encountered (Dobles).

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5

In the dry it's nicely planted although too soft at the rear which makes it squirm in such a way that it affects the handling overall. In the wet it's spinning up with hardly any extraordinary throttle input and the front will slip if you are not careful - in this respect I would not put my worst enemy on this machine as a new rider.

Engine 3 out of 5

Mopeds will blow you away in first and second, 3rd up is good for a buzz in the dry but my god do you have to work it.

Reliability & build quality 2 out of 5
Value vs rivals 1 out of 5

First, the petrol cap seized up within the first year and had to be replaced alongside the ignition barrel, was replaced under warranty luckily otherwise expect a £600 bill. Head bearings were shot within the first year, never experienced this on any other Japanese bike. I'm sure they never greased it up properly in the factory. Out of mileage warranty (£250). Passing filter switch not working within 13 months although this was down to Dobles mechanics damaging it when replacing the clutch cable then they denied it. Clutch cable shot after 13 months - never experienced this again on any other Japanese manufacturer. Chain and sprocket were shocking after one year and needed replacing (£200). The ABS disc looks ten years old after one year.

Equipment 3 out of 5

Looks are good but the bike is too skinny and needs a bigger petrol tank and overall dimensions. This bike has cost me more to maintain than a K9 GSXR600!

Buying experience: Maybe I got the duff one but overall I'm never buying a Honda again. Everything I've mentioned is a fifteen month review.

1 out of 5 Not worthy at all
18 April 2018 by Terry

Year: 2017

Not worthy of its price at all. For £1,000 more I can have a Kawasaki Ninja 650 which is more powerful, factory fitted with slipper clutch, dual front disc brake.

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5

Using single front disc brake to stop a motorcycle of this weight is barely acceptable. Ride quality is fairly comfortable

Engine 4 out of 5

Reasonable power & torque. Running very smooth.

Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5

Overall quality is good. Nothing rattle or vibrate so far. Just disappointed by the cheap looking swingarm.

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

Annual service cost is acceptable, not much different with other model or brand. Fuel economy is fairly good.

Equipment 2 out of 5

No gear position indicator, spool adapter. Badly design storage compartment, water gets in every time, as well as dust or grime come in from below.

Buying experience: Regret buying this, not worth its price at all. I should have gone for something cheaper or spend a little more for a Kawasaki Ninja 650.

5 out of 5
20 June 2017 by Eurorider

Year: 2017

Annual servicing cost: £100

Surprisingly smooth and torquey for a 500cc, which makes it feel bigger than it is in the real world, and so much more fun/easy to handle compared to large displacement bikes. Things like LED lights, very effective little fairing, super MPG and range, with the usual Honda finish makes it a class act, that you don't need to trade in when you get more experience. I traded down from more cc!

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Plush ride is a real surprise for what could be a budget bike, handling is very good to about 8/10ths, with the new updated suspension. Brakes very good, 2 finger stopping. Rides to Germany and back, no problem with the effective fairing.

Engine 4 out of 5

Very good torque for a 500cc, only thing wanting is a little more top end, but then it wouldn't be a 500cc A2 bike. More power than you need to get out of cars, especially below 120kph. Very smooth engine for a twin. Honda like.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Zero issues, nearly a quality looking as a VFR800F!

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Very inexpensive 1st service vs 4 Cyl bikes, long maintenance intervals. Simple, bullet proof.

Equipment 4 out of 5

+ Finish is high quality, like the bronze engine finish, LED headlamps, adjustable suspension and levers etc. + Added available Heated grips, nice, and USB plug. - Could use a Gear indicator and Outside Temperature Gauge, otherwise complete.

Buying experience: Dealer

4 out of 5 CBR 500R A2 Best bike?
15 May 2017 by Dan A

Version: ABS

Year: 2014

Annual servicing cost: £120

Good bike coming from a 125 t the mandatory A2 license. This bike is excellent but just misses a bit of sportiness and character comapred to alternatives such as the KTM RC390. However, this has much more of a foot in the practical camp as well where as the KTM is just pure out little race bike.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Ride quality is superb although i find that at low rpm's trying to keep a steady 30 mph can be feel quite jerky sometimes, this may be due to my exhaust i've installed and haven't yet re-mapped. I've ridden a inline-4 and found it much smoother so perhaps this is just a trait of a parallel twin engine. Single cylinders seem to be the same. Going through the rpm's and gears though is lovely. It just seems it want's to get up and go. Brakes are not as strong as i like especially the back, never having an abs bike before i'm not sure i like it as i feel the abs kicks in quite early.

Engine 4 out of 5

Engine runs sweet as, throughout the rev range. As mentioned before holding a steady 3-4000rpm is slightly jerky but other than that the engine is perfect. It really has some go between 5-8000 alothugh i often keep it between 3-4000 for town & city riding. The engines surprisingly doesn't start to cut out and stall until as little as 1500-2000rpm. You really have power throughout the rev range which is really good for new riders. it doesn;t take much effort to ride this or get it going compared to a nija 300 which you need to rev the beans of to get it moving. However, personally i think i prefer if the engine did have a higher rev liit as the 8000 comes a little too soon.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Reliability 5/5 never had a problem, quality i'd give it a 4/5. The gear box can be quite clunky at times. Overall the finish is really good for the price.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Just a service via the recommended miles. Chain and sprocket have done fine, the standard tyres needed changing at 5000 miles.

Equipment 4 out of 5

Standard tyres are okay along with sprocket and chain but when changing i would upgrade to something better but it's not something that i would rush to change.

5 out of 5 A great fun forgiving bike
08 November 2016 by James Coombes

Version: CBR500R RA

Year: 2016

Actually a great first bike with plenty of power on tap, very forgiving but with more than enough power for average country roads at motorway cruising speeds. Great fuel economy and a relaxed riding position. If you want a motorway cruiser there are better out there. Likewise if you just want a track bike this might not be for you. Taller that 6ft 2" then you may struggle on long cruises and certainly if you ride two up then move on. Would I change my mind in hindsight about buying this bike? A definite no is the answer it looks the nuts (mini fireblade) and is great fun to ride whilst not having that sportsbike tank hugger pose (which really kills the back). The fuel economy is great and hopefully because it is a Honda visits to the repair shop will be low.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Front brakes does the job but by no means are the best but come with ABS as standard. Ride quality in the twisties are good and where the bike is best. You cannot really ride pillion (Unless you are both light and you are very friendly with the rider). It is a really good all round bike for one. If you are tall then you need an aftermarket screen otherwise prepare to freeze in winter or get neck ache.

Engine 5 out of 5

Very good for a twin, power is smooth across the rev range. One or two gears out there is more than enough torque to get good power delivery. Compared to the 650F you have to ride it a bit harder to get good progress but i feel you get to use more of this bike on UK roads.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

It's a Honda but i have only covered 1500 miles

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

I average about 76mpg with a mix of riding. Very cheap to insure, servicing i guess is about average.

Equipment 3 out of 5

Getting aftermarket parts can be difficult for the 2016 model. There is no gear indicator. ABS is standard. Really dislike the rear number plate assembly so think a tail tidy is needed also a radiator guard is probably needed as after a week the front radiator had a few stone bends in the fins.

Buying experience: I paid £5100 including first service (apparently RRP is £5599) in October there were plenty of deals to be done.

5 out of 5 A bike with everything I needed and a first-rate riding experience
21 June 2016 by Nick

Year: 2016

Motorbike journalists may not enthuse over a bike like this, but for me it has everything. Fun to ride on the open road but also spot on for urban use - a perfect all rounder. Looks like sportsbike but comfortable as well. It ticks all the boxes.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

The ride comfort is excellent. I'm over 6 foot tall and can ride for 3 hours with no discomfort thanks to the low seat (785 mm) and relatively high bars. Standard screen and fairing does a really good job of deflecting air.

Engine 5 out of 5

The engine pulls smoothly from as low as 1500 rpm, has perfect fuelling on bog-standard petrol and can hold a steady speed in built-up areas without any snatching (unlike my previous KTM 690 Duke), Even running-in has sufficient power and torque to hold its speed uphill and into a strong headwind.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Too early to say but build quality appears to be excellent

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Over 250 miles, 92 mpg checked brim-to-brim. Running-in at maximum of 5000rpm.

Equipment 5 out of 5

It has everything I need without switchable maps and riding modes. If I am picky it could do with a gear indicator but a previous 2010 Fireblade didn't have one either.

Buying experience: Bought from a Honda dealer (Newcastle Motorcycles). No pressure, decent length test ride, happy with part-exchange price, personal service. Paid advertised price £5599. I think it is excellent value for money.

5 out of 5 BRILLIANT BIKE.
24 March 2016 by Jacob mannall

Version: RA-F ABS

Year: 2015

Annual servicing cost: £160

No complaints for the price. It has enough power to rival most on the road with exceptional comfort and touring abilities as well as acceleration and a top speed of 120mph

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Great ride quality, but would benefit from double front brakes when dealing with speeds of 120mph, the chassis loves hard corners, but braking with one brake means earlier braking and a slower ride.

Engine 5 out of 5

Great motor, would benefit from a high rev limit as 8.5k redline is reached reasonably quick.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Although in 2015 I had two recalls on my CBR, they were quickly taken care of. The bike feels the same as when i bought it 7000 miles ago.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

£28 per month service plan is good value.

Equipment 5 out of 5

Great, easy to modify or adjust. Replaced the large Dunlop rear

Buying experience: Honda have exceptional customer care.

4 out of 5 My Retirement present (or new girlfriend)
29 February 2016 by Warlock

Year: 2014

Nothing adverse to say other than needs a gear indication on the otherwise well appointed instrument panel. Beautiful bike, easy to ride, comfortable and enough grunt to get you away from the idiot on 4 wheels. Ninja 300?..don't even go there, the CBR500R waxes it

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Numb Bum syndrome, but then it's 20 years since I rode, and I'm a tad on the old side (60)

Engine 5 out of 5

Smooth and enough power for an old fart

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

It's a Honda, enough said

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

So far, 3.5 - 4.0 L/100k......impressive eh?

Equipment 4 out of 5

Gear indicator!!!!....5000 rpm and 100 kph equals 6'th gear, anything else is guess work

Buying experience: Dealer, $7990 on road with 6 months rego...bargain

3 out of 5 Solid but not spectacular
19 May 2015 by AceCafe

Year: 2014

Good value and it looks like a fast Honda... even though it isn't really. Looked like being king of the budget sporty bikes for a while. Then the MT-07 rocked up and I wish I'd bought that instead. Maybe I will. Good if you're stuck on an A2 licence though and restricted to 47 bhp which this is and the MT-07 isn't!

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5

okay

Engine 4 out of 5

Solid if a little unspectacular. You soon get a bit bored of it. Maybe I can take the A2 restrictor kit off... oh no I can't it hasn't got one. this is it.

Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5

Furry nuts and bolts after a while.

Value vs rivals 3 out of 5

First service is pricey because it needs valve clearance checking/adjusting. Okay after that little shock

Equipment 2 out of 5

Basic - you get what you pay for. In this case, not much!

Buying experience: Good

Back to top